Dirrell fell on his own, didn't protect himself and got ktfo.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Glamour Puss
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 12516
    • 456
    • 270
    • 15,684

    #1

    Dirrell fell on his own, didn't protect himself and got ktfo.

    Period end of.

    Nobody should pay their bets if you bet on AA.

    And AA's people need to contest this and seek to overturn this ****.

    If AA had dropped him ala Barrera/Marquez and then hit him while down the way Barrera did JMM, you people would have a point.

    But Dirrell went down on his own, the way he always does and failed to protect himself from AA's punches.

    Thus he got ktfo and deserved to lose.

    Period.
  • H3K
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 121
    • 11
    • 31
    • 7,581

    #2
    Originally posted by Roy O'Bannon
    Period end of.

    Nobody should pay their bets if you bet on AA.

    And AA's people need to contest this and seek to overturn this ****.

    If AA had dropped him ala Barrera/Marquez and then hit him while down the way Barrera did JMM, you people would have a point.

    But Dirrell went down on his own, the way he always does and failed to protect himself from AA's punches.

    Thus he got ktfo and deserved to lose.

    Period.
    Shut up *****.

    Dirrell schooled Abe.

    Comment

    • boxaholic
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 2651
      • 38
      • 19
      • 8,927

      #3
      I paid my 200k. I agree somewhat but regardless of my belief the result is a win by DQ for Andre.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #4
        YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO WIND UP AND TRY TO KO A FIGHTER THAT IS ON THE GROUND. IT IS AGAINST THE RULES.

        Honestly, if Dirrell had done the same thing the same people defending Abraham would be making a villain of Dirrell.

        Comment

        • Sweet Jesus
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 11512
          • 568
          • 332
          • 13,576

          #5
          He did not fall on his own. Replays clearly showed his right leg slipping on the advertisement sticker on the ring floor.

          Comment

          • Sweet Jesus
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 11512
            • 568
            • 332
            • 13,576

            #6
            Originally posted by bojangles1987
            YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO WIND UP AND TRY TO KO A FIGHTER THAT IS ON THE GROUND. IT IS AGAINST THE RULES.

            Honestly, if Dirrell had done the same thing the same people defending Abraham would be making a villain of Dirrell.
            That's Boxing Scene for you.

            Comment

            • Glamour Puss
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 12516
              • 456
              • 270
              • 15,684

              #7
              Originally posted by boxaholic
              I paid my 200k. I agree somewhat but regardless of my belief the result is a win by DQ for Andre.
              Come on meing. Its obvious.

              The same way Dirrell went for the k.o punch when Abe was turning away complaining about the low blow.


              Would the d.q Dirrell if he had landed that punch and k.o'd Abe?

              Doubt it.

              This punch was no different. He slipped and didn't tie up. AA did the right thing by decking him.

              Comment

              • arraamis
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 8319
                • 583
                • 439
                • 23,488

                #8
                How are you guys on a BOXING FORUM and don't even know the freakin rules????

                Comment

                • P.WILL
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 5450
                  • 427
                  • 376
                  • 6,533

                  #9
                  Dirrell was clearly on the canvas enough time for Queen Abraham to recognize him, thus Abraham should not have thrown. People on this forum are a.) trolls looking for attention or b.) idiots.

                  Comment

                  • ShoulderRoll80
                    Up and Comer
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 35
                    • 14
                    • 0
                    • 6,073

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Roy O'Bannon
                    Period end of.

                    Nobody should pay their bets if you bet on AA.

                    And AA's people need to contest this and seek to overturn this ****.

                    If AA had dropped him ala Barrera/Marquez and then hit him while down the way Barrera did JMM, you people would have a point.

                    But Dirrell went down on his own, the way he always does and failed to protect himself from AA's punches.

                    Thus he got ktfo and deserved to lose.

                    Period.
                    You even know the rules of boxing?

                    If a fighter either by accident, by his own admission or by a punch goes to a Knee or to the ground you can not hit him regardless.

                    Those are the rules. Doesn't matter who you are.

                    As soon as Dirrell was on the ground you can't hit him regardless of the situation. Every boxer knows that rule and it was clear Dirrell was on ground for enough time for Abraham to see.

                    Abraham saw an opportunity to get a little sucker punch in and didn't think it would effect Dirrell the way it did. He assumed Dirrell would complain and just get back up.

                    Dirrell didn't and by the rules that is a DQ.

                    I don't think Dirrell was faking, but even if he was Abraham broke the rules and it was a flush punch not grazing blow.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP