Current BoxRec P4P ratings

[Heeb]

Kelly Pavlik shouldn't be on that list.

[boxingking500]

look at all the american bias to the kitschkos

im american, but this is ridiculous

klits are definitely top 10 P4P....

[DIB42]

look at all the american bias to the kitschkos

im american, but this is ridiculous

klits are definitely top 10 P4P....

I have a hard time putting them in the top 10p4p generally Heavyweights don't make it into most peoples top p4p anyway.

I'd put vitali on there i suppose, because he's had some bigger named opponents and he's done rather well, although wlad stayed active for the time vitali wasn't fighting.

I dunno, 10 p4p maybe top 20 p4p definately

[jameshepenstall]

boxrec do it on points i think, its messed up, pavlik shouldnt be that high nor should vitali

They are up that high because of their KO percentage, a big factor in p4p. The actual fighting weight doesnt affect the ratings as much as the opposition faced, the opponents faced KO % and records, boxers KO % and longevity.

[F l i c k e r]

1

Manny Pacquiao welterweight
2

Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
3

Floyd Mayweather Jr welterweight
4

Wladimir Klitschko heavyweight
5

Vitali Klitschko heavyweight
6

Chad Dawson light heavyweight
7

Paul Williams light middleweight
8

Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
9

Kelly Pavlik middleweight

10

Arthur Abraham super middleweight

They can't be considered p4p. Why? P4p definition....

A SMALLER GUY WITH THE SKILL TO BEAT MUCH LARGER GUYS BUT WOULD NOT BE EXPECTED TO WIN BECAUSE OF THE SIZE DIFFERENCE.

(ex: Juan Manuel Marquez has the skill to beat WWs but cannot beat Welterweights because of a distinct size disadvantage.)

So with that said.... How in the world can Heavyweights be considered p4p?

[S A M U R A I]

Nobody takes notice of BoxRec rankings. It's a weird system they use, it doesn't reflect the RING rankings which most of us follow.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3