Current BoxRec P4P ratings

[Nautilus]

The BoxRec P4P computer is worse than the BCS ratings.

That should tell you all you need to know.

At least computer scoring has some objectivity that you don't.

[Sweet Jesus]

At least computer scoring has some objectivity that you don't.

I'm objective. Wlad belongs in the top 10, not Vitali though.

[Nautilus]

I'm objective. Wlad belongs in the top 10, not Vitali though.

LOL. I am objective too, and Vitaliy also belongs to top 10.

[Sweet Jesus]

LOL. I am objective too, and Vitaliy also belongs to top 10.

Alright, have a nice day buddy.

[jrosales13]

You are probably from Ukraine but not Ukrainian. Never mind.

This counter-factual statement "I doubt Klitschko facing JMM at the same weight would win" is quite ridiculous.

Do you imply that K should drop 100 pounds of weight or JMM should gain 100 pounds of weight?

No man, do you know the definition of P4P?

[Russian Crushin]

Its called POUND 4 POUND ranking, Not defeated best fighters in thier division rankings

If it was called that then Wlad and Vitali would be #1 and #2

Look at it this way, if JMM and the Klitschkos were at the same weight, JMM wins easy.

The Boxingrec rankings use computers which would obvioiusly put klitschkos up there because the Klitschkos dominate and beat the best heavyweights

[DIB42]

I'd have trouble arguing in favor of that list, if one tried, they could make a case for all of those people in the order they're in, but it'd be a stretch and require too much effort. Not a terrible list but i give it a B-

[boxing2106]

i guess they couldnt find anyone to replace the klits

[Pirao]

I don't know if would have Wlad and Vitali that high, but they should definitely be in the top 10. A guy from the RING had them both tied at #7, I think that's about right.

[Boxin']

This is an objective system, so your American biasses against Klitschkos are not taken into account by the system.

They are heavyweights. p4p is designet for non heavyweights