Manny Still hasn't fought any slick fighters!

[Shadows]

Im out...but since these cowards ducked my question...I'll go ahead and kill any of this b.s. of pac ducking slick fighters

Tim Austin and Mark Johnson- Both fought at 118, a division pac never competed at and was to big to drop down to.

Junior Jones-Him and Pac were never in the same division at the same time

Freddie Norwood-By the time Manny was at 126, Freddie was on a 3 year plus hiatus from boxing

Kevin Kelley-not slick and completely shot when pac got to 126.

Joan Guzman-Real talk Guzman is not slick, Ali funeka thought you that and will again show you when they fight for the second time. He only look slick against slow ass humberto soto.

Zaheer Raheem-Him an Pac weren't even in the same weight class. Pac had just gotten to 130, so to move up to 135, especially after a loss at 130, is ****in retarted. I can't believe people try to spin this as a Pac duck. IF he would have fought him, people would cry that he didn't avenge his loss and was ducking Morales.

Nate Cambell-dude is not slick at all. Only thing is he is african american. If he is slick then so is Cotto, Barrera, and others.

Paulie Malignaggi-dude aint slick one bit whats so ever. You don't get hit as much as he does to be considered slick. If slow ass Juan Diaz, who is even slower at 138, can hit he flush repeatedly, you are not slick

Tim Bradley-again this dude is not slick and is only African American. Also his only win was over Junior Witter at the time, and was basically a no body at 140 lbs when Pac fought Hatton. Hatton was the Ring champ and #1 guy, so why in the hell would you pick bradly over him?

Shane Mosely- Dude ain't slick at all

Both Too Sharp and Pacquiao fought at flyweight. However, I'm pretty sure Johnson had left the division by the time Pacquiao won the WBC belt.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Pac has a chance to fight a slick fighter.

Lets see if he picks Valero or Marg, some more face first tailor made fighters.

[Khalid X]

They were both at 122 at the same time I think. But that was after the McKinney/Morales back to back 4th round KO.

naah bro...

Junior Jones last fight at 122 was in 1998 and pac didnt move up there until dec 99.

Jones last fight at 126 was in 2000 and Pac didn't get into that weight class until 2003.

Neither were in the same weight class at the same time.

[RTorrecampo]

"Manny still hasnt' fought any slick fighters"


Manny hasn't fought a heavyweight either. Pacquiao is clearly ducking!!!

[Khalid X]

Both Too Sharp and Pacquiao fought at flyweight. However, I'm pretty sure Johnson had left the division by the time Pacquiao won the WBC belt.

Johnson had moved up to fight for Tapia's vacated belt. This happened before the Sasakul fight, which is why Manny vs Sasakul was for the Lineal title.

Johnson would have never fought Pac then, because Pac was still a prospect. Johnson business at 112 was basically done and he was moving up to bigger and better things. Maybe if Manny could have made weight, they could have fought at 115 or 118, but unfortunatly Sigurat fight happened.

[F l i c k e r]

So what? TS is basically saying, Pacquiao hasn't faught PWill or Mayweather.


Name anyone else who is so called "slick" and Pacquiao destroys them. Which is pretty much Bradley and I think Pacquiao owns the fuck out of him.

[Shadows]

Johnson had moved up to fight for Tapia's vacated belt. This happened before the Sasakul fight, which is why Manny vs Sasakul was for the Lineal title.

Johnson would have never fought Pac then, because Pac was still a prospect. Johnson business at 112 was basically done and he was moving up to bigger and better things. Maybe if Manny could have made weight, they could have fought at 115 or 118, but unfortunatly Sigurat fight happened.

I'm not saying they should of fought, or anything, but it was mainly reference to your post where you said that he fought at 118, and Pacquiao didn't fight there. Just pointing something out.

Pacquiao-Sasakul didn't crown a lineal champion, if that's what you mean. The linearity dates back to Miguel Canto in the 70's. Canto held the WBC belt, and it hasn't been vacated since Canto held it. Hence why Koki Kameda is already the lineal champ.

[Khalid X]

I'm not saying they should of fought, or anything, but it was mainly reference to your post where you said that he fought at 118, and Pacquiao didn't fight there. Just pointing something out.

Cool. I was aware of them fighting at 112 but I just thought it was no point in bringing it up because by the time Pac become a legit player in the division, Johnson was making an exit to scoop up Tapia's vacant super flyweight belt. I wouldn't even reply to you like this, but I know some Floyd fans would take what you said and twist it to fit an agenda.....lol

Pacquiao-Sasakul didn't crown a lineal champion, if that's what you mean. The linearity dates back to Miguel Canto in the 70's. Canto held the WBC belt, and it hasn't been vacated since Canto held it. Hence why Koki Kameda is already the lineal champ.

I thought I did but maybe your right. I alway wondered about that though because Sasakul was the top fighter in that division at the time (atleast to my knowledge). Why wasn't it for the lineal belt if Sasakul was considered the best in the division at the time?

[Shadows]

Cool. I was aware of them fighting at 112 but I just thought it was no point in bringing it up because by the time Pac become a legit player in the division, Johnson was making an exit to scoop up Tapia's vacant super flyweight belt. I wouldn't even reply to you like this, but I know some Floyd fans would take what you said and twist it to fit an agenda.....lol





I thought I did but maybe your right. I alway wondered about that though because Sasakul was the top fighter in that division at the time (atleast to my knowledge). Why wasn't it for the lineal belt if Sasakul was considered the best in the division at the time?

Sorry man, I think I confused you.

Sasakul was already the lineal champ. When you said 'crown a lineal champ' I thought you meant that the lineage starts there. It doesn't, it goes back to the 70's.

The lineage hasn't been broken since it started.

[Khalid X]

Sorry man, I think I confused you.

Sasakul was already the lineal champ. When you said 'crown a lineal champ' I thought you meant that the lineage starts there. It doesn't, it goes back to the 70's.

The lineage hasn't been broken since it started.

ok I see were there is confusion. I completely worded that wrong. I didn't mean "it was to crown the lineal champ", even tho I typed that, I meant it was for the lineal title...something in which Sasakul already had.

Sorry man...it's just I posting fast and responding to 3 threads right now...lol