Mayweather's career vs pacquiao's career so far

[BIGBOXINGFAN]

racist? As much as his fellow american wants floyd to be a fighter of the decade can't vote him because it will be a blatantly bias, they know damn well that floyd didn't do anything to be even nominated as a fighter of the decade, but since floyd is an american they just put floyd behind pac as a fighter of the decade so that i wouldn't be too obvious that they are favorable towards floyd.

What are you talking about? It says alot about the voters who voted for a cheater and a scared little *****. You are the fighter of the decade but you are not able to take blood test because you get weak? Thats who you love? A steroid user who is a ducker. If he is so much better than Mayweather, why not take the test and fight him?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I don't have any problems with it El. I am a mayweather fan as long as it is in the ring. The question is more of personal preference and IMO, generally the odds-beater is often more impressive. Which goes to show why people are more impressed with Pac than Mayweather except of course the boxing fans.

But the fact that Floyd was favored is also impressive. Hes that good. Goes both ways my dude. What Pac AND Floyd did is impressive.

[tesla_power]

How about this bro.

They both get the job done and are great fighters.

No?

Like I said, I'm also a fan of Pbf but the question is really personal in nature. I'm just attempting to let you see why people are more impressed with pac than pbf.

[Allucard]

Who do think has had a more impressive career so far? I looked at both their careers objectivly and here is what stood out to me. Before Manny moved up in weight to fight Oscar I think most people would say Floyd had the better career to that point. The biggest names on his resume up to that point were Oscar, Jose Louis Castillo, Diego Coralles, Zab Judah, and Gatti. Manny's biggest names were Marquez who is was 1-0-1 against, Morales who he was 2-1 against and Barerra. The reason floyds career up to that point is more impressive is because he was still undefeated having only been close to losing in the first Castillo fight. Manny had lost 3 times and had one draw. Both fought solid opponents up to that point. Since then Floyd KO'd an undefeated Hatton and dominated Marquez, both were comming off big solid wins. Manny beat the crap out of Oscar who had just lost to Floyd but beat Forbes in a warm up fight, killed Hatton who had lost to Floyd 18 months prior but had a solid win over Malignaggi, owned Cotto who had been KO'd my Margarito just before he narrowley defeated Clottey, and Clottey who just lost to Cotto.
Manny looked better in his wins than Floyd did but if you look at the context of the fights and when they took place they are not that great. Manny should get a couple extra points for moving up so many weight classes so fast. Who do you guys think has had a better career?

Manny has TWO draws and THREE loses. Good post though. I think Floyd edges a close dec career wise. For the context. The Ricky Hatton Floyd beat was much much more game than the one Pacquiao beat who was (and i'm quoting Ricky) "just happy to be here". Can you compare "just happy to be here" to "lts have him!" backed by the undefeated 43-0 record and the chance to become an ATG had he beat Floyd? (yes an ATG we know how it works for the brits :O)
Also the Oscar Floyd beat was the lineal and Ring champion at 154, the one Pacquiao beat was weight drained and cashing out.

[tesla_power]

But the fact that Floyd was favored is also impressive. Hes that good. Goes both ways my dude. What Pac AND Floyd did is impressive.

I did say that in my initial response. "Yes, he is that good". Check it out. Lolz.

[Puntoyhauf]

For your information before you come in here Flaming this is what i responded too:




So next time read back before you flame.

LOL at you calling it FLAMING...hahaha. I'm not flaming bro... I'm just saying that it sucks using woulda..coulda. Same can be said to El Pacman... he's a biased poster but as I often say I have respect for all of you guys even when we often agree to disagree.

You have seen FLAMING here before Burner, and I think you know I am not.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I did say that in my initial response. "Yes, he is that good". Check it out. Lolz.

You're right.

Do you think Floyd will be favored against Pac?

[javysouthpaw]

For anyone who says Floyd has not faced tough opposition, you have to apply the same standards to Paquiao. The names on Floyd's resume outwiegh the names on Paquiao's and if you look at when he fought them it is more impressive. The only thing Pac has over Floyd is Cotto and if Floyd beats Mosley then that will be just as impressive as a win against Cotto.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Fact is these guys need to fight each other. Prove it in the ring.

[DR.ORGYY]

Fact is these guys need to fight each other. Prove it in the ring.

FINALLY U AINT BEING BIASED