Mayweather's career vs pacquiao's career so far

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Not really...his opposition hasn't been THAT good. Can you say Pacquiao probably couldn't do the same or even better against the same opposition if their roles were reversed? I think Pacquiao would of killed Gattin in 1-3 rds tops, would of brutalized Baldomir, KO'd Judah sometime late, and still do the same to Hatton as he did...

I think Floyd wouldve destroyed the Cotto that Pac fought.

He wouldve boxed Clotteys head off.

He wouldve beat Morales and Barerra easily.

It goes both ways. Floyd and Pac need to get in the ring together.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

But it wasn't the same kind of favoring. A lot picked Hatton/Cotto/Clottey/even Diaz to be too big and too much for Pac going up in weight. You had to watch to really see if he bit off too much to chew each time. But each time he went in there and dominated his opponents which made it more grand. Look, when I pick whose gonna win between a Floyd fight and his opponent, it's not because Floyd is that damn good, it's because his opponent is that damn bad or perfect for him. He said it himself, he has to make the right business decision, and that equals to least risk with more reward. Pac has gone time and time again into risk with reward. That will be remembered in history no doubt.

What are you talking about?

Are you telling me Diaz and Clottey werent tailor made for Pac?

Are you telling me Pac took all the toughest fights he could he have ever taken?

Are you telling me that you just said Pac gets more credit because he wasnt favored alot but he was favored OVER Clottey, Diaz, Hatton and Cotto?

So which is it?

You act like Pac doesnt make business decisions.

Roach made that clear when he told Shane Mosley he was too good to fight Pac.

[led]

the racist biased media who don't like mayweather voted pacquiao fighter of the decade. Real fans who been around the sport for a long time know the truth. Mayweather was fighter of the decade by far.

thats a real racism!!!!!

An asian beat american in his own land!!!!!!

Mayweather is the fighter of the decade only to *****s in nsb.

Pitiable you are...

[Puntoyhauf]

It's almost a no-brainer. It's been asked over and over and the outcome is still the same.

Floyd Mayweather is the better boxer of the two...definitely.

Though Pacquiao was often times regarded as one dimensional he did what he had to do with his available skills through hard work and it has been rewarding all these years.

If only Mayweather did not chose to retire prematurely then unretire too late it would have been better for his career.

[BIGBOXINGFAN]

in your fantasy world yeah floyd is the fighter of the decade, but we are in the real world buddy, sorry bro i really like floyd too but he doesn't have the balls to show to the world that he could get the fighter of the decade. The only argument he has are coulda, shoulda, woulda...... lol.

You don't like Floyd. Your just a ******* with Manny's **** in your mouth. The only world you live in is ******* world. Shut the **** up and go jack off to wapakman

[Puntoyhauf]

I think Floyd wouldve destroyed the Cotto that Pac fought.

He wouldve boxed Clotteys head off.

He wouldve beat Morales and Barerra easily.

It goes both ways. Floyd and Pac need to get in the ring together.

would have, could have... wow don't you just hate it when that's the strongest argument you got to back-up Floyd?

[El Jesus]

But it wasn't the same kind of favoring. A lot picked Hatton/Cotto/Clottey/even Diaz to be too big and too much for Pac going up in weight. You had to watch to really see if he bit off too much to chew each time. But each time he went in there and dominated his opponents which made it more grand. Look, when I pick whose gonna win between a Floyd fight and his opponent, it's not because Floyd is that damn good, it's because his opponent is that damn bad or perfect for him. He said it himself, he has to make the right business decision, and that equals to least risk with more reward. Pac has gone time and time again into risk with reward. That will be remembered in history no doubt.

Ok, so as usual, even though pac was favored in all of the above mentioned fights, somehow its "not the same kind of favoring" but when floyd is favored its somehow different. This is just so dumb its not even worth discussing anymore.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

would have, could have... wow don't you just hate it when that's the strongest argument you got to back-up Floyd?

For your information before you come in here Flaming this is what i responded too:

Not really...his opposition hasn't been THAT good. Can you say Pacquiao probably couldn't do the same or even better against the same opposition if their roles were reversed? I think Pacquiao would of killed Gattin in 1-3 rds tops, would of brutalized Baldomir, KO'd Judah sometime late, and still do the same to Hatton as he did...

So next time read back before you flame.

[Puntoyhauf]

You don't like Floyd. Your just a ******* with Manny's **** in your mouth. The only world you live in is ******* world. Shut the **** up and go jack off to wapakman

These words make NSB a ****place... it was better before. You guys always resort to these kind of post when you got nothing logical or relevant to say.

It gets both ways... to PAC AND FLOYD NUTHUGGERS... you guys made this forum a garbage dump.

[tesla_power]

to be fair, mayweather would have to move to 160 to have a fighter actually be favored to beat him. i mean, everyone is genrally caught up in pacs rise from 106 to 147, but mayweather coming from 130 to 147 is still pretty good.

You would be hard pressed to find a fight where mayweather wouldnt be favored, even against pac, hes still the favorite and pac is the consensus guy whom everyone feels would just obliterate him.

You cant critisize floyd for being favored, because on the other hand, pac was favored against hatton, cotto and clottey. as well as david diaz, etc

I don't have any problems with it El. I am a mayweather fan as long as it is in the ring. The question is more of personal preference and IMO, generally the odds-beater is often more impressive. Which goes to show why people are more impressed with Pac than Mayweather except of course the boxing fans.