Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” – Wladimir Klitschko: Jab Jab Jab, **** **** ****

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” – Wladimir Klitschko: Jab Jab Jab, **** **** ****

    by David P. Greisman - How many times have I written this column?

    How many times have we seen Wladimir Klitschko be so good at making his opponent look so bad?

    How many times have we talked about how Klitschko being so good at making his opponent look so bad is what keeps him from being seen as great?

    We expect our greats to have flash and panache. Wladimir Klitschko wins with simplicity, using his considerable size and considerable smarts to accentuate his strengths and exploit his opponents’ weaknesses.

    Klitschko has gone from being relegated to the scrap yard to regaining the spotlight. He has won 12 straight, nine by knockout. Those dozen victories have come against men with a combined record of 345 wins, 18 losses and 10 draws. He has beaten six former world titlists and captured two of the four major sanctioning body belts.

    Most of those victories have looked the same. Klitschko keeps his opponent at a distance with jabs, occasionally dropping a sledgehammer of a right hand or tossing in a left hook. If his opponent gets too close, he either takes a quick step backward, or he ties them up and leans his weight over them, tiring them out and keeping them from testing his chin. He breaks their spirit. If they don’t get stopped due to the accumulation of punishment, they get knocked out. [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    "4. Can anyone really blame HBO for not buying Klitschko-Chambers?"

    Nope.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the article!

      I will just repeat what I`ve told already - Klitschko needs to fight and beat convincingly Povetkin (a pressure-type fighter), Boytsov (a puncher), David Haye (a very fast puncher) and maybe Tua and have a rematch with Peter. Solis could be a great option if that fat idiot dropped some 20-30 lbs...

      Comment


      • #4
        Why on earth would anyone pay to watch Wladimir fight let alone 51,000 people!!! I just don't see why you would put yourself through it? Jab, Jab and Jab some more!! The guys terrified to let his shots go.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
          by David P. Greisman - How many times have I written this column?

          How many times have we seen Wladimir Klitschko be so good at making his opponent look so bad?

          How many times have we talked about how Klitschko being so good at making his opponent look so bad is what keeps him from being seen as great?

          We expect our greats to have flash and panache. Wladimir Klitschko wins with simplicity, using his considerable size and considerable smarts to accentuate his strengths and exploit his opponents’ weaknesses.

          Klitschko has gone from being relegated to the scrap yard to regaining the spotlight. He has won 12 straight, nine by knockout. Those dozen victories have come against men with a combined record of 345 wins, 18 losses and 10 draws. He has beaten six former world titlists and captured two of the four major sanctioning body belts.

          Most of those victories have looked the same. Klitschko keeps his opponent at a distance with jabs, occasionally dropping a sledgehammer of a right hand or tossing in a left hook. If his opponent gets too close, he either takes a quick step backward, or he ties them up and leans his weight over them, tiring them out and keeping them from testing his chin. He breaks their spirit. If they don’t get stopped due to the accumulation of punishment, they get knocked out. [Click Here To Read More]
          i wonder when the klitschkos will fight in america again? or any other country as a matter of fact apart from germany..

          Comment


          • #6
            Eat more ****, billions of flies can't be wrong.
            Watch more Klitschko, millions of Germans can't be wrong...

            Well, I was there, it was a good show and well worth the ticket price. I felt sorry for Eddie, 'cause the whole arena was rooting for Wlad. But the fireworks before the fight was more exciting than several of the middle rounds of the fight.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Lacrimosa View Post
              Thanks for the article!

              I will just repeat what I`ve told already - Klitschko needs to fight and beat convincingly Povetkin (a pressure-type fighter), Boytsov (a puncher), David Haye (a very fast puncher) and maybe Tua and have a rematch with Peter. Solis could be a great option if that fat idiot dropped some 20-30 lbs...
              He's fighting Povetkin next, and would have fought Haye already if Haye didn't pull out. Boytsov does not deserve a shot right now, he has not beaten anyone.

              Comment


              • #8
                It's pretty boring, only fight i want to see is Haye-Wlad.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Carnivore, I praise Klitschko for being so good at what he does and for making it look so simple, but I also question the quality of the heavyweight division, and I note that such a combination doesn't exactly lead to the most entertaining fights.

                  After Ray Austin, I got on the IBF for foisting Austin as a mandatory (and foisting other undeserving fighters in other divisions).

                  I don't see where I'm wrong. I'm happy to hear constructive critiques, rather than the baseless accusations you're sending forth.

                  That said, thanks for giving me a read all these years, and thanks for your comment. I don't expect everyone to agree with me, but I'd much prefer conversation and debate compared to reckless blasting.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mr. David View Post
                    Carnivore, I praise Klitschko for being so good at what he does and for making it look so simple, but I also question the quality of the heavyweight division, and I note that such a combination doesn't exactly lead to the most entertaining fights.

                    After Ray Austin, I got on the IBF for foisting Austin as a mandatory (and foisting other undeserving fighters in other divisions).

                    I don't see where I'm wrong. I'm happy to hear constructive critiques, rather than the baseless accusations you're sending forth.

                    That said, thanks for giving me a read all these years, and thanks for your comment. I don't expect everyone to agree with me, but I'd much prefer conversation and debate compared to reckless blasting.
                    Do you realize your style of writing, although it's effective, is very negative and boring?

                    Have you noticed you generally don't get as many replies as other writers on boxingscene? Are you aware that people are looking for entertaining reading not the same old boring negativity?

                    We get that you don't like Wladimir - are you capable of just once writing an article without reaching to find a negative aspect to his successes to bore us with? Why not try to create some interest in the heavyweight division, instead of trying to diminish it?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP