HBO got smart. Haye vs. Klitschko or nothing.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why isn't Klitschko vs. Chambers on HBO?
Collapse
-
-
the fights gonna suck, it's a mismatch if you ask me. you have a super heavyweight fighting a regular heavyweight with no power. nothing against chambers but he's over matched and basically a dead man walking.
vitali is somewhat exciting, at least he throws punches and tries to get his fighters out of there. wlad on the other hand, is boring, doesn't take any risks, doesn't trade with his opponents, and clinches about as much as john ruiz.
nothing worse then watching a over cautious giant......... shrek has more aggression in him then wlad.
hbo is probably tired of getting burned by wlad, i bet they've lost a **** ton of money on them as well as jermain taylor........Last edited by deuce_drop; 03-17-2010, 08:43 PM.
Comment
-
The whole "they are boring" excuse is a poor one because they put boring fighters on PPV all of the time, I mean FFS they put Hopkins/Wright on PPV.
What did you think you were going to get with two guys who claim to have the best defense in the game?
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulf View PostThey aired the Vitali/Johnson fight, which i would defniitely describe as "dead air". I'm sure it didnt have the best effect on their ratings, so I understand why they passed up on the this one.
Let's not forget, Vitali-Arreola had the best ratings of any HBO fight in 2009.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blaze778 View PostJust curious considering Chambers is an American heavyweight who has been on a winning streak after losing to Povetkin, not to mention HBO's support of the Klitschko brothers.
Comment
-
Comment