Why isn't Klitschko vs. Chambers on HBO?

**FloydTBE** · 03-17-2010, 08:11 PM

Originally posted by blaze778

Just curious considering Chambers is an American heavyweight who has been on a winning streak after losing to Povetkin, not to mention HBO's support of the Klitschko brothers.

HBO = not intesrted in the fight

**Ekscape** · 03-17-2010, 08:13 PM

HBO has continuously supported the Klitschko's but I think after Vitali's last boring as one sided win and Vitali's last boring as one sided win they have finally stopped giving a ****... which kinda sucks I guess... Trust me, you won't see the Klitschko's back on HBO until they fight fight David Haye/ Arreola again/ or each other

**Earl-Hickey** · 03-17-2010, 08:13 PM

HBO has lost faith in American heavyweights, after several years of poor showings.

**Swag Hustla** · 03-17-2010, 08:14 PM

Originally posted by JonoYoungP4P

HBO = not intesrted in the fight

That's obvious, but this fight looks better on paper than any other Vitali/Wlad fight (not counting Vitali vs. Arreola). Maybe HBO is losing interests after Wlad vs. Thompson and Vitali vs. Johnson were pretty boring fights.

**The_Demon** · 03-17-2010, 08:15 PM

its the boredom factor that wlad brings

**infamous larryx** · 03-17-2010, 08:19 PM

great question..seems like hbo is black balling the klit bros...

**-EX-** · 03-17-2010, 08:20 PM

Wlad's previous fights have been dull...

**DC Fight Fan** · 03-17-2010, 08:21 PM

Because Chambers is a chubby cruiserweight who can't bust a g****. Yes he is skilled but he is absolutely no match for either Klit Bros.

**Spray_resistant** · 03-17-2010, 08:24 PM

Its just more boxing ***getry, as to the reason I cite for this one not being on any American TV networks,

Why isn't Klitschko vs. Chambers on HBO?