Logic puzzle for *******s: So, you guys believe Floyd has ESP or is a telepath?

[IMDAZED]

That he had no other opponents that's bankable at the moment so he chose Mosley.

As he said during Pacquiao negotiations that he would do? Agreed.

[rao007]

as he said during pacquiao negotiations that he would do? Agreed.

heh?.......

[IMDAZED]

heh?.......

As he said he would during Pacquiao negotiations? As in, if the Pac fight falls through, we'll fight Mosley? Yes, he did.

[Lead Cenobite]

As he said he would during Pacquiao negotiations? As in, if the Pac fight falls through, we'll fight Mosley? Yes, he did.

These things don't happen in ******* land. Sorry.

[BlackHat]

Wait wait wait.

Am I reading this thread right?

Did the *******s just say:

Pac should get credit if he had fought Mosely at 142. After you repeatedly showed them that Roach thought Mosely was very dangerous.

But on other threads they are saying Mosely is old?

WAT?

Where did someone mentioned that?

[BlackHat]

There person who made the original statement is the one who has the burden of proof. So depending on which one of you guys first said that Mosely was a bigger draw, or Cotto was......that person needs to come up with something to back up his claim, not the other way around.

IMDAZED brought up that PAC avoided Mosley so I guess that's where it should start.

[rao007]

As he said he would during Pacquiao negotiations? As in, if the Pac fight falls through, we'll fight Mosley? Yes, he did.

Then he changed his mind. He said he wouldn't fight Mosley because he's not a PPV attraction but agreed to fight him after the Pacquiao fight fell through. There you have it.

[IMDAZED]

IMDAZED brought up that PAC avoided Mosley so I guess that's where it should start.

Sure. Then you claimed it wasn't true. That Cotto was equal risk and a bigger moneymaker prior to facing Pac. How do you know? You observed it. What did you observe? Take a poll.

[IMDAZED]

Then he changed his mind. He said he wouldn't fight Mosley because he's not a PPV attraction but agreed to fight him after the Pacquiao fight fell through. There you have it.

In late November 2009, Leonard Ellerbe stated that if negotiations with Pacquiao fell through, Floyd would fight Shane Mosley. When did he change his mind after that? When he did just that?

[BlackHat]

Sure. Then you claimed it wasn't true. That Cotto was equal risk and a bigger moneymaker prior to facing Pac. How do you know? You observed it. What did you observe? Take a poll.

I posted some facts. Mosley didnt even made a mil with the biggest man in boxing in Oscar while Cotto has a whole nation behind him. Aren't those facts? Now what are your facts that Shane is bigger than Cotto? oh wait I know we'll see.

on another note, why would you not give credit to Pac if he won against Shane assuming you think Shane is riskier than Cotto? that doesnt make sense. you wont give credit means it's an easy fight? which is which?