Okay, but the blame would still be placed on Pacquiao in that instance.
Also, since when has the NSAC had more leverage than the boxers themselves and their legal and promotion teams? Personal demands have always superceded the commission's own bare minimum stipulations.
The are allowed to request additional stipulation, but not demand them. If the fight falls apart over an additional request that is denied the fighter making the request is at fault.
The are allowed to request additional stipulation, but not demand them. If the fight falls apart over an additional request that is denied the fighter making the request is at fault.
Not when his opponent agrees THEN changes his mind.
The are allowed to request additional stipulation, but not demand them. If the fight falls apart over an additional request that is denied the fighter making the request is at fault.
Using boxing negotiations as an example, explain the difference between a request and a demand.
What's the difference? The NSAC will test them as well.
Because they're not THE commission. If USADA was the main commission then I would agree that Pacquiao would be changing commission rules but he isn't...he's followed followed NSAC regulations therefore USADA rules are debatable and ergo stipulations.
i dont think he sees that asking for stricter blood testing is the same thing as asking for a stricter weight penalties. some would even argue that adding catch weights is even worse than asking for stricter blood testing. if that doesnt drain a fighter literally, i dont see how a blood test does.
You're letting facts get in the way of a good argument.
Tweet
Comment