Landing 20% of your punches = "A Masterful Performance"?? Ummmmmm...

[Boxing Scene]

That's not true is it?are you called Everyone nowadays?

Yeah pretty much EVERYONE knows this is ******, and reflected by your rep of ZERO, EVERYONE thinks you're a dumb ass.

[Jim Tom]

Yeah pretty much EVERYONE knows this is ******, and reflected by your rep of ZERO, EVERYONE thinks you're a dumb ass.

Who cares about a rep from Philipinos?Shame on you if you think the rep is the same as a credit rating

[Chups]

*****s Masterful performance = 3 potshots per round.

[Jim Tom]

You're saying that Pac did not land a single body shot the entire fight?

You're an idiot.

Dont put words into my mouth mr inteligensia,read before you answer.If he didnt land why did I talk about ratios?

[FloydTBE]

pac did what he neede dto do

[Cash Cow]

Total thread failure. Everyone in this thread made you look like the fool that you are.

so his performance was masterful?

everyone saying that "pac did what he could do' further establishes that the performance was sub par

[Jim Tom]

Because when I mentioned he landed to the body, you said "He hit the elbows".

You're denying everything I said Pac did. So basically, he did nothing in your eyes.

NOthing not in absolute but relative terms,we together Mr Inteligensia?

[tredh]

you have to look beyond that man
come on dude dont be such a hater
give credit where its due
I have my su****ions on Manny but you cant hate for him throwing as many punches as he did and hold up his end of the fight
its not his fault Clottey is a heartless gutless ussy that doesnt want to risk getting hit

Come on man giving Manny credit for the win and saying Manny's win was masterful is 2 way different things. I give Manny credit for win no doubt about it he won without any controversy but in no way shape form or fashion can abody seriously call that win "masterful" cause it just wasn't. There is nothing wrong with it not being a so called "masterful" win. Its all about winning as long as its fair and deserved.

[Jim Tom]

In relative terms, Clottey got hit a hell of a lot more than he gave. And he was covered up 99% of the fight. Manny took that 1% and landed over a 100 punches. Are you saying that CompuBox is ******ed and saw imaginary punches?

Pacquiao got hit over 100 times with harder and cleaner punches.Everytime he got hit his head moved like it was about to be uprooted.I assure you he will be stummering like Roach soon.

Having said that,he wasnt impressive.A great fighter would set up Clottey to make him open.Floyd will land shots at will against anyone,now that's greatness.People claim Floyd is a runner,what do you call Pacquiao,he didnt even try inside fighting,but then when one is a one dimensional runner like Pacquiao it's pointless to mention

[ThePunchingBag]

Come on man giving Manny credit for the win and saying Manny's win was masterful is 2 way different things. I give Manny credit for win no doubt about it he won without any controversy but in no way shape form or fashion can abody seriously call that win "masterful" cause it just wasn't. There is nothing wrong with it not being a so called "masterful" win. Its all about winning as long as its fair and deserved.

I don't see how Pac could've won the way he did without putting on a masterful performance.

Pac put on a shutout against basically a middleweight who is notorious for being tough stylistically for virtually everybody.

That is masterful and I don't see anyone who could do that right now.