Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Will Never Fight Pacquiao, Says Ariza/Salud

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jtiger78 View Post
    now aint that some ****??? i guess its cool though we can sit in the sun and not burn ya know lol
    You know it J. We tropical people anyway. I prefer my sun accompanied by a long legged big booty woman(perferably the one that comes home to me daily, but if her ass cant get with this daydream then I'll have to sub her for one that will) and cool, frosty drink of choice(something with a umbrella stuck through a pineapple and cherry thats got some 90+ proof alcohol mixed up in it). LOL.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by letsgobrady View Post
      every time i see manny fight the more i think floyd will embarass him
      Technical skills I think so.

      As a person no. Some people on here will be because they don't understand Mayweather's style. Pac will be open to Mayweather who loves an aggressive come forward style. Embarrassed? No, he has a country if not countries behind him. If anything he will tell and show people just HOW GREAT Mayweather is.

      I like both but at a technical standpoint Mayweather will school Pac. I know Pac is more exciting and has more power and has this and has that, but he doesn't have the technical skills of Mayweather. You say embarrass I say he will humble him to an understanding of why Roach wanted more time! Roach is an ATG trainer. People need to listen to him more.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
        I mean, people think I am bias towards Floyd but somebody
        please tell me. Is it possible for floyd to be scared of Pacquiao
        when Roach has went on Record to say.........

        [IMG]http://i67.***********.com/albums/h315/GRUSTLER/box_a_roach_200-1.jpg[/IMG]

        NUFF SAID!

        "We'll have a change in sparring partners and style because Mayweather is so different than our last four opponents [Cotto, Ricky Hatton, De La Hoya and David Diaz]. We have to study him really hard. But I know Mayweather really well. I just need Manny to see what I see." Freddie Roach.

        TRANSLATION:

        Manny Pacquiao ain't ready for Floyd
        even after his best performances.
        Grust!!!! Stop it!!!!!! It's too much knowledge of proven facts being thrown at us(those that want to ignore the facts and continue to operate in a non-logical manner) at an alarming rate of accuracy and speed. LOL.


        Keep hittin'um up with the factual knowledge Grust. Hit'um up till they head explode bruh.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GRANDSLAM View Post
          Mayweather UD's Shane and Pac. Manny beating a man who had no interest in winning the fight doesn't change my mind I'm afraid, Clottey was only interested in going the distance, it was pathetic.
          No I think he wanted a paycheck and the exposure. I mean it is really that bad to lose to Pac? He lost but now has a somewhat "bigger" name in a sense. He's still "that guy that Pac beat" but its better than what he was before.

          The fight was exactly what people that understand boxing called it. A sparring session with little to no challenge. Pac is fighting SIZE, not talent. These types of fights wont prepare what is in store for Pac if he so ever steps in the ring with Mayweather. People need to listen to Roach more often and they will understand why Pac didn't fight Mayweather (yet).

          Clottey from the get go was a horse **** fight. Boring as hell and not worth the $60 I paid. I would rather of watched Pac shadow box for a half an hour than that **** this past Saturday.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by switchhitter View Post
            What makes people on this forum more educated than the founding secretary general of the WBC and a strength and conditioning coach? These two people dedicate their lives analyzing and examining boxing (well Ariza to a certain extent).

            You people on this forum talk as if you know everything about boxing when I bet half of you have never even gotten into a ring and sparred.
            A hell of a lot more than half; I'd say their major "fighting" experiences have been in the school playground.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WESS View Post
              No I think he wanted a paycheck and the exposure. I mean it is really that bad to lose to Pac? He lost but now has a somewhat "bigger" name in a sense. He's still "that guy that Pac beat" but its better than what he was before.

              The fight was exactly what people that understand boxing called it. A sparring session with little to no challenge. Pac is fighting SIZE, not talent. These types of fights wont prepare what is in store for Pac if he so ever steps in the ring with Mayweather. People need to listen to Roach more often and they will understand why Pac didn't fight Mayweather (yet).

              Clottey from the get go was a horse **** fight. Boring as hell and not worth the $60 I paid. I would rather of watched Pac shadow box for a half an hour than that **** this past Saturday.
              I completely agree with you potna. I agree with every damn word.

              Comment


              • The comissions or the councils should state the rules for the terms of this fight if it fight happens.

                Everyone wants to see the fight so all concerned including fighters & promoters should make a mutual agreement and move forward or leave it alone.

                I love our sport but when this load of rubbish goes on it makes a mockery of it.Imagine if all other sports were like this.

                Comment


                • mayweather will never fight pacquiao because pacquiao will never fight mayweather

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                    Lol, almost all of the Pacquiao fans already know that floyd was scared to fight pac.
                    Fixed it for you.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by deanrw View Post
                      Ronnie is always cool in my book. People complaining about the quotes in the article have to realize the quotes are not his quotes, but the people he is interviewing.






                      Also as for Pac taking more shots than usual this fight, well it was a given. He had a guy unwilling to engage so he put himself in harms way to try to take Clottey out of his shell.
                      That's the problem right there. They might as well be his quotes. He only interviews people with one point of view. The point of view he obviously shares with them. That makes him not only biased but predictable. He has an agenda. I could just as easily go out and interview Mayweather's team and fans but claim "These are not my statements." It's biased and in no way professional if you want to call yourself a true writer, reporter or "journalist".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP