Some people are really starting to irritate me.
Clottey fights NOTHING like Mayweather. They are both defensive, sure, but completely different. So for those people who say "look how easily pac beat a defensive fighter" or "clottey landed right hands and uppercuts all night" as some sort of proof that pac would win or lose against floyd are simply being idiotic.
Further, pac's strategy against Clottey would not be the same strategy against Floyd, obviously.
It's stated over and over and over on this site yet still some of you still don't understand that styles make fights. Clottey's style is nothing like Floyd's, nor is Mosley's like pacquiao (yet I'm sure after May 1st there will be hundreds of threads about how the results of shane/floyd will be proof of how floyd/pac will end up). You cannot draw comparisons from guys who fight nothing like the guy.
Clottey fights NOTHING like Mayweather. They are both defensive, sure, but completely different. So for those people who say "look how easily pac beat a defensive fighter" or "clottey landed right hands and uppercuts all night" as some sort of proof that pac would win or lose against floyd are simply being idiotic.
Further, pac's strategy against Clottey would not be the same strategy against Floyd, obviously.
It's stated over and over and over on this site yet still some of you still don't understand that styles make fights. Clottey's style is nothing like Floyd's, nor is Mosley's like pacquiao (yet I'm sure after May 1st there will be hundreds of threads about how the results of shane/floyd will be proof of how floyd/pac will end up). You cannot draw comparisons from guys who fight nothing like the guy.
Comment