Tyson Vs Liston - Prime 4 Prime
Collapse
-
-
Well your a dumbboy cause floyd was a basic mike and didn't fight the exact same dummy and way smaller and joe was nothing like Joe fought nothing like him you dumb follower so comparing him and floyd makes no sense so why use it
both son and george was both slow and easy to read how is that wrong for mike you idiot stop see how repeating dumb quotes other dummies use makes you look like a idiot
The person who beat george who fought somewhat like mike beat george left him out you crazy dummies always do
The person who fought like son named sam lost to mike see how not watching matches exposes you
Mike was wrong for them he destroyed those types he beat a pusher like george named Trevor
He beat Smith a better tech slugger then george and had more speed and was close range which would be harder for mike to avoid shots using logic but he had trouble
Why would george beat mike when he was slower then both Trevor and razor and had no defense
Why would son who was easier to read then george land on mike when he was also slower then both Trevor and razor
u followers need to stop repeating these dumb old quotes that's been exposed years ago we have vid idiot
Watch matches instead of exposing yourself dummy.
Doesnt matter what your messed up mind thinks from dumb quotes other crazy dummies think on vid mike showed he destroyed those like son and george like I saidComment
-
Well Angelo Dundee would...wouldn't he. Which only means that he was Ali's trainer and corner guy. Tyson would beat any heavyweight in History at his best.Comment
-
Liaton was good, but far too slow for Tyson. He'd have a tough time even finding him.I think Liston is historically underrated. There is a chance he could get blitzed early by Tyson, Mike was so dangerous in those first few rounds, his speed was difficult to adjust to early, but my pick is Liston by late stoppage. Once the pace slowed Liston would take over
Tyson all the way.Comment
-
Easy one this, Tyson much faster, hits just as hard if not harder, much better overall boxing skill.
Liston's advantage would be his jab but Tyson would swarm all around it, likely stopping him late.Comment
-
Wrong would be early son was way to slow and easy to read why would it be late son wasn't that tough and and why would that be a advantage having a slow easy to read jab
mike beats him in 2Last edited by Ascended; 02-11-2022, 04:42 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Tysons training was far too intense for him to stay healthy or fit into a prime at 30
Personally i think Tyson was better, ive never seen a heavyweight with so much lateral movement, side to side up and down bob n weave....whilst throwing punches, the prime we know of, was only when he was 20 years old....imagine what he would of been at 28-30, he would of been either the greatest or by far one of the greatest boxers that ever lived
Thats my opinion anyway.... of course styles make fights, some1 like ali might well beat him, but how many alis have there ever been? lolComment
Comment