Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao ordinary?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    The only reason I am bumping this thread.

    Is due to me not being able to respond to JK1700 thread about Pac being ordinary since that little maggot has me on ignore...

    So JK1700, Vito C, Bhopreing, and anybody else who agrees that Pac was ordinary can come in here and explain to me how was he ordinary? You guys are nothing but parrots but come in here and explain.

    And, to answer JK1700 question... Was Alexis Arguello ordinary? How many losses did he have early one? Name the fighters who actually beat him?

    But, he was a true ATG, a 3 division champ, HOF'er, arguably the greatest 130 pound fighter of all time. Nothing ordinary about that.

    Yet he got KO'd by bums, he got outboxed by fighters who were not Morales caliber. And, yet Arguello was extraordinary fighter.

    Now since I answered your little dumbass question you can come in here and explain how Pac was oridnary.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
      I take whatever Floyd says with a grain of salt. But, some of his fans really believe what man says like is gospel.

      So for the fans who believe Pac was ordinary before he hit 25.

      How can an ordinary fighter win 3 titles in a spand of 5 weight-classes. And, also win 2 lineal titles. And, beat a prime borderline ATG. What ordinary fighter has done that before?
      His hand game was kinda ordinary, nothing really jumped out at you, he was able to accomplish much through those classes for these reasons, he was usually bigger than his opponents, his aggression, his extraordinary stamina, being a southpaw didnt hurt either, all while having good reflexes and quick hands.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Bhopreign View Post
        His hand game was kinda ordinary, nothing really jumped out at you, he was able to accomplish much through those classes for these reasons, he was usually bigger than his opponents, his aggression, his extraordinary stamina, being a southpaw didnt hurt either, all while having good reflexes and quick hands.
        This man went from 112-126 and won a lineal title in both, also with winning a title at 122 while skipping 115 and 118. Nothing ordinary about that.

        Only fighter to win a lineal title at flyweight and featherweight over a 100 years in history. Over a 100 years in history nothing only fighter to accomplish that. Nothing ordinary about that.

        At 112 beat the man, at 122 beat the guy who at the time people was saying was the best 122 pound fighter in the world. And Pac beat him with only 3 weeks notice. I repeat he beat the guy who at the time people were saying was the best 122 pound fighter in the World in just 3 weeks notice. Nothing ordinary about those hand games.

        Barrera at the time was highly touted, P4P elite level fighter, ESPN had just put him in the top 50 greatest fighters of all time. And, Pac destroyed him, stopped. Nothing ordinary about those hands games to be able to do that to a fighter in Barrera caliber.

        You saw what the very versatile version of Barrera did to Tapia? Hamed? even his wars with Morales? Peden? Juarez? Neither one of those guys could do that to Barrera what Pac did to him? How would you consider those fighters hand game? Yet look what Pac did?

        Think about what you saying... Nothing ordinary about the... Pac was never ever ordinary. He was always an extraordinary fighter. And, yet he is improving and becoming a more complete fighter. But, was never ordinary.

        Ordinary fighters don't accomplish what Pac did man.

        Comment


        • #44
          I guess extraordinary fighters get KTFO'd multiple times by bums.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Vito Corleone View Post
            I guess extraordinary fighters get KTFO'd multiple times by bums.
            Was Alexis Arguello not an extraordinary fighter?

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
              This man went from 112-126 and won a lineal title in both, also with winning a title at 122 while skipping 115 and 118. Nothing ordinary about that.

              Only fighter to win a lineal title at flyweight and featherweight over a 100 years in history. Over a 100 years in history nothing only fighter to accomplish that. Nothing ordinary about that.

              At 112 beat the man, at 122 beat the guy who at the time people was saying was the best 122 pound fighter in the world. And Pac beat him with only 3 weeks notice. I repeat he beat the guy who at the time people were saying was the best 122 pound fighter in the World in just 3 weeks notice. Nothing ordinary about those hand games.

              Barrera at the time was highly touted, P4P elite level fighter, ESPN had just put him in the top 50 greatest fighters of all time. And, Pac destroyed him, stopped. Nothing ordinary about those hands games to be able to do that to a fighter in Barrera caliber.

              You saw what the very versatile version of Barrera did to Tapia? Hamed? even his wars with Morales? Peden? Juarez? Neither one of those guys could do that to Barrera what Pac did to him? How would you consider those fighters hand game? Yet look what Pac did?

              Think about what you saying... Nothing ordinary about the... Pac was never ever ordinary. He was always an extraordinary fighter. And, yet he is improving and becoming a more complete fighter. But, was never ordinary.

              Ordinary fighters don't accomplish what Pac did man.
              I answered your question but you reply with overlooking with what I said. I said his hand game was kinda ordinary. If you cant come to the conclusion that he was mostly a 1-2 fighter for a very long time then I dont know what to say.

              Comment


              • #47
                uhhmm ordinary, how?

                lineal champ at 19 yrs old.. two-belt holder at 23 y.o.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign View Post
                  I answered your question but you reply with overlooking with what I said. I said his hand game was kinda ordinary. If you cant come to the conclusion that he was mostly a 1-2 fighter for a very long time then I dont know what to say.
                  If his hand game was "KINDA ORDINARY" he would not had accomplish the **** he did.

                  If his hand game was "KINDA ORDINARY" he would not had beat Barrera, who was prime and a borderline ATG, in the fashion he did....

                  There was nothing and I mean nothing ordinary about Pac as a fighter. He was always extraordinary as a fighter.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                    If his hand game was "KINDA ORDINARY" he would not had accomplish the **** he did.

                    If his hand game was "KINDA ORDINARY" he would not had beat Barrera, who was prime and a borderline ATG, in the fashion he did....

                    There was nothing and I mean nothing ordinary about Pac as a fighter. He was always extraordinary as a fighter.
                    I could explain a few things to you but I dont have the time.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      pacquiao is the GOAT end of thread

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP