Overrated Bad Decisions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #11
    Originally posted by MARKBNLV
    disagree i had oscar winning 9 rds
    I had Tito winning 7 rounds... Oscar really did not win ever single round for the first 9 rounds...

    Comment

    • MoneyMayFan
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 1917
      • 66
      • 8
      • 13,196

      #12
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      Winky-Vargas
      No that was a robbery. Robbery because vargas was looked at as the next big thing. They couldnt have him lose against a no name like winky.

      Comment

      • Thread Stealer
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 9657
        • 439
        • 102
        • 17,804

        #13
        Sometimes it's the margin a fighter won by that bothers me rather than the decision. I don't have a problem with Leonard beating Hagler or Williams beating Martinez (I scored both 114-114). But Jo Jo Guerra had Leonard winning 118-110, and that one judge had Williams winning 119-109. That's just ridiculous.

        Comment

        • MoneyMayFan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 1917
          • 66
          • 8
          • 13,196

          #14
          Originally posted by Thread Stealer
          This one could go on and on. People always call fights "robberies" when they're really close.

          Mosley-De La Hoya 2. PED use aside. DLH boxed well in the early going, Mosley got the better of it in the late rounds. There were many close rounds. Oscar's win over Whitaker too. That was a pain in the ass to score. A very close fight. People call Leonard-Hagler a bad decision, but that was a close fight that could've gone either way. Mayweather-Castillo 1 is greatly exaggerated. Castillo did very little in the beginning and gave away too many rounds.

          Then of course you have people going "look at the Compubox", as if that amazingly accurate system means much.
          This..People that didnt even watch the fight calls it a robbery because of hate.

          and oscar got robbed vs tito...no doubt about it

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #15
            Originally posted by MoneyMayFan
            No that was a robbery. Robbery because vargas was looked at as the next big thing. They couldnt have him lose against a no name like winky.
            It was not a robbery. It was a fight that could of gone either way... And, Vargas was in crappy shape in that fight. But, still was competitive no way was it a robbery... It just a close fight that you could make a case for Winky winning. But, by no means was it a robbery.

            Comment

            • MoneyMayMafia
              Banned
              • Feb 2010
              • 335
              • 24
              • 14
              • 454

              #16
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              Pacquiao-Marquez II
              JMM spanked pac in that fight

              Comment

              • MARKBNLV
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 17497
                • 789
                • 707
                • 27,868

                #17
                Originally posted by jrosales13
                I had Tito winning 7 rounds... Oscar really did not win ever single round for the first 9 rounds...
                thats one of the great things about boxing people see things differently at times.

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 739
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                  Sometimes it's the margin a fighter won by that bothers me rather than the decision. I don't have a problem with Leonard beating Hagler or Williams beating Martinez (I scored both 114-114). But Jo Jo Guerra had Leonard winning 118-110, and that one judge had Williams winning 119-109. That's just ridiculous.
                  I agree, I had Malignaggi beating Juan Diaz in the first fight. But, I scored it close. There were a couple swing rounds that if I would of went the other way. I would of Diaz winning the fight. So I ddin't consider the outcome a robbery like most people did. But, the scorecard was just horrible.

                  Comment

                  • Chunk..
                    Shot To ****!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 32228
                    • 687
                    • 163
                    • 47,451

                    #19
                    Froch - Dirrell.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 739
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #20
                      Originally posted by MoneyMayMafia
                      JMM spanked pac in that fight
                      Dude it was a close fight there is no robbery... Tell me 7rds that JMM clearly won. Not rounds that were close or could of went either way. But, 7 rounds that JMM clearly won.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP