Pac vs JMM. WHOEVER had JMM winning is on Z Side of Meth!!!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Head-Butter
    Banned
    • Mar 2010
    • 96
    • 17
    • 0
    • 139

    #1

    Pac vs JMM. WHOEVER had JMM winning is on Z Side of Meth!!!!!

    That fight was not even close. I duno why people are saying JMM got robbed there.

    Pacquiao is the one who got robbed. EASILY. JMM won 5 rounds. So it's pac 7-5 and the you thrown in the first 10-6 round. JMM DID NOT EVEN GET CLOSE!!!!!!!!!!!
  • str8ballin
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 338
    • 18
    • 0
    • 6,533

    #2
    Originally posted by Head-Butter
    That fight was not even close. I duno why people are saying JMM got robbed there.

    Pacquiao is the one who got robbed. EASILY. JMM won 5 rounds. So it's pac 7-5 and the you thrown in the first 10-6 round. JMM DID NOT EVEN GET CLOSE!!!!!!!!!!!
    lol which fight? 1st or 2nd?

    the thing is it could have gone to either fighters. pac had the KDs..marquez looke phenomenal givin pac a schooling in counter punching.

    Comment

    • Head-Butter
      Banned
      • Mar 2010
      • 96
      • 17
      • 0
      • 139

      #3
      Originally posted by str8ballin
      lol which fight? 1st or 2nd?

      the thing is it could have gone to either fighters. pac had the KDs..marquez looke phenomenal givin pac a schooling in counter punching.
      Sorry. I was talking about the first fight!!!

      Second fight meh a draw there would have been fine. But in no way did JMM outclass pac like soooooooo many people claim!!!

      Comment

      • B-Money
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 151
        • 6
        • 0
        • 6,206

        #4
        i dunno how people can say he won, when he got knocked down multiple times.

        Comment

        • -Huey-
          Toledo, Spain.
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 7812
          • 653
          • 382
          • 14,803

          #5
          They were both badass fights! That's all that matters. Razor thin close.

          Comment

          • -Rab
            D.E.P. Felix Castro
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 3750
            • 141
            • 136
            • 10,426

            #6
            This crap again? All I have to say is that Marquez looked better than Manny in both fights and pretty much imposed his will. He landed more punches and with a higher percentage in both fights. If he didn't have such a glassy jaw, He would've easily won those fights.

            Comment

            • str8ballin
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 338
              • 18
              • 0
              • 6,533

              #7
              when you watched the fight when it actually happened...in no way you'd go with marquez.

              my theory why people say marquez won, and its just my opinion... Pac was introduced to mainstream media as this collosal fighter who cant be hurt and who dominates his opponents....and this is what they saw in the DLH, and consequently, the hatton fight.

              then they try and watch the old fights to get sum history on whoever this pacquiao is, and what they see is a normal dude getting whacked by marquez and morales.

              if you stuck by pac's career from the beginning... no question in my mind that you'd see growth. he was a lame one handed fighter who spammed his left punch. In my mind he grew and developed during his wars with MAbarrera, morales, and marquez. those 3 made pac who he is today.

              dont believe me? watch older pac fights before Mab-Mor-Mar. he was nothing special.

              Comment

              • F l i c k e r
                Il Principe
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 20742
                • 1,324
                • 858
                • 83,771

                #8
                Originally posted by rabagiyo
                This crap again? All I have to say is that Marquez looked better than Manny in both fights and pretty much imposed his will. He landed more punches and with a higher percentage in both fights. If he didn't have such a glassy jaw, He would've easily won those fights.
                Not a glassy jaw. He just stands in a position that makes him unable to catch himself when knocked off balance. He stands too sideways, for lack of a better term.

                Comment

                • Royalty
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 86
                  • 7
                  • 0
                  • 6,134

                  #9
                  The last time I watched the first fight, I scored it for Pacquiao by a few rounds.

                  The second fight is debatable, though. That could've gone either way, in my opinion.

                  Comment

                  • r.burgundy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 1636
                    • 177
                    • 61
                    • 8,290

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Head-Butter
                    That fight was not even close. I duno why people are saying JMM got robbed there.

                    Pacquiao is the one who got robbed. EASILY. JMM won 5 rounds. So it's pac 7-5 and the you thrown in the first 10-6 round. JMM DID NOT EVEN GET CLOSE!!!!!!!!!!!
                    that 1st fight was a ****in travesty.pac deserved that win on his record,but 2nd fight was to close.shoulda been a draw

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP