Is HAROLD LEDERMAN the WORST unofficial judge in history???
Collapse
-
I generally don't mind Lederman, but he makes mistakes sure.
I like how Showtime does press row scoring better so it's like 3 judges albeit from the media, to give it a more well-rounded picture of how the fight is going.
It's funny though. No one knows what goes on the mind of official judges unless it's open scoring...
(I hate open scoring btw)Comment
-
He made some pretty ******ed scores. I can't believe he actually scored round 12 in Marquez I & II in favor of Pacquiao...And he actually had Pac winning more rounds in Marquez I...Like what the hell! I could understand scoring it 113-112 in favor of Pac because one of the rounds was close, but to score it like 114-111 or 115-110? That's insane.
He also gave Collazo a few rounds in the Berto fight where he literally did nothing.
But I guess overall he had some good nights and bad nights. I mean he did get Diaz-Malignaggi I correctly.Comment
-
Comment
-
I generally don't mind Lederman, but he makes mistakes sure.
I like how Showtime does press row scoring better so it's like 3 judges albeit from the media, to give it a more well-rounded picture of how the fight is going.
It's funny though. No one knows what goes on the mind of official judges unless it's open scoring...
(I hate open scoring btw)Comment
-
Because fighters ahead run away to preserve the victory and the trainer of the losing fighter is most likely to tell the fighter quit than go for a ko.
I've seen this countless times.Comment
-
who? like once? 999 times out of a thousand the trainer is not gonna tell someone to quit.Comment
Comment