Pacquiao went from 106 to 147. Floyd went from 106 to 154.

[imscythe]

Yeah they both went from 106 to where they are now.

Floyd did not directly accuse Pac of using steroids but from his statements you get some hints. He's forcing Pac to take the tests because of the allegation of his father, floyd will take the test because he was the one who made that offer.

Pac look su****ious to others when he did not agree on Floyd's offer and Floyd refused on Pac's counter offer but the test would not have been a problem when Floyd just brought it up to NSAC, coz testing is beyond boxer's negotiation it should be implemented to all boxers or else you look like your singling out your opponent.

If they were sincere on making the sport clean they could have brought it up to a boxing commission by now.

And let's get things straight, Pac agrees to the testing if NSAC was the one who implemented it.

[1toTHADOME]

pacs stipulation isnt basless but floyd is, umm, go figure.

has floyd come in over 147? you said he didnt, and you did said basically the stipulation doesnt exist being that floyd wont come in over 147.

make up your mind *******. i love owning this ****** logic of yalls


ill even go so far to say that both of their stipulations were baseless but the difference is, Floyd agreed will pac didnt. you still get owned

lol fcuk outa here. youre not owning anybody. get your head out your ass.

and floyfs stipulation is meaningless to pac but not to floyds team. however floyd still agreed while pac didnt.

damn this ownage is too easy, just stop posting man

lol at least youre fight about something. floyds stipulation were meaningless to pac, thats why he DIDNT take it. pacs stipulation were meaningless to floyd, that's why he DID take it.

[Hannibal Barca]

lol fcuk outa here. youre not owning anybody. get your head out your ass.



lol at least youre fight about something. floyds stipulation were meaningless to pac, thats why he DIDNT take it. pacs stipulation were meaningless to floyd, that's why he DID take it.

I'll ask again. Are more stringent testing policies bad for the sport?

[Va_BoriKua]

lol fcuk outa here. youre not owning anybody. get your head out your ass.



lol at least youre fight about something. floyds stipulation were meaningless to pac, thats why he DIDNT take it. pacs stipulation were meaningless to floyd, that's why he DID take it.

he owned your ass

[Pullcounter]

how about you answer that for me and ill respond to your answer

oh... so floyd was in danger of not making weight... then putting that stipulation into the contract was a good idea no?

[pasawayako]

If floyd can win tittles going up in weight it's because he's that great and if pac can win tittles going up in weight its because he's on peds. WTF!

[1toTHADOME]

he owned your ass

***** and another *****. of course you'd agree

[Pullcounter]

I'll ask again. Are more stringent testing policies bad for the sport?

no they are good for the sport, so let's start with the entire card of mosley/mayweather and every future GBP fight.

[1toTHADOME]

If floyd can win tittles going up in weight it's because he's that great and if pac can win tittles going up in weight its because he's on peds. WTF!

lol EXACTLY!

[imscythe]

I'll ask again. Are more stringent testing policies bad for the sport?

It is not bad for the sport. Present your arguments to the commission and let them handle it, sincerity is what is lacking from Floyd's camp.