Pacquiao went from 106 to 147. Floyd went from 106 to 154.

[Pullcounter]

of course you would, only ******* logic makes sense to fellow *******s.

if its meaningless, then the stipulation wouldnt have been in the contract. you fail just like he does

so floyd was in danger of not making weight?

[twosweethooks]

why is Floyd accusing Pacquiao of steroids, again?

Floyd accused Pacquiao and brought the random blood tests up to the day of the fight to Stop Manny from fighting him. He Knows he will get KO'd by Pac.

Mosley will KO Mayweather around 9.

[ballgamessuck]

Because he beat up drained, washed-up, and old opponents?

Yeah, the logic is not sinking in.

Boy that is the popular excuse isnt it. If Paq fought Jmm again (and I think he should), and knocked him silly, Mayweather would claim "its because I softened him up", and all Mayweathers fans would believe him. The bottom line is Mayweather went twelve rounds against DLH and never hurt him, Paq mad him quit on his stool and retire. Mayweather took 10 rounds to knock out Hatton, Paq crushed him in 2, Mayweather went twelve rounds against JMM and knocked him down once, Paq went 24 rounds and knocked him down four times. Paq is a destroyer, Mayweather and his fans refuse to admit it.

[ballgamessuck]

Because he did it in under like an year. Mayweather went from 106-150

No, Paq did not go from 106 to 147 in a year. He went from 106 to 130 in about eight or ten years, then from 130 to 147 in a year, then back to 140 and up to 147 again in another year.

[mazdaru]

youre a fail. fcuk outa here. i never said the stipulation didnt exist and floyds stipulation is baseless.

there's a thin line where you can go overboard with these stipulations. my point is that pacquiao didn't, and floyd did. floyd asking for something out the ordinary coz he assumes and has a "hunch" pacquiao is on something is a baseless stipulation.

pacs stipulation isnt basless but floyd is, umm, go figure.

has floyd come in over 147? you said he didnt, and you did said basically the stipulation doesnt exist being that floyd wont come in over 147.

make up your mind *******. i love owning this ****** logic of yalls


ill even go so far to say that both of their stipulations were baseless but the difference is, Floyd agreed will pac didnt. you still get owned

[ballgamessuck]

basically as Pacquiao moves up in weight and age gets better :/ maybe it's because he doesn't have to drain himself anymore or maybe its something else but its kind of weird but oh well

Paq's weight gain has been primarily muscle gain, he has put on muscle in the proper way in such that it made him steadily faster and stronger.

[mazdaru]

it's meaningless to floyd, not pacs team.

and floyfs stipulation is meaningless to pac but not to floyds team. however floyd still agreed while pac didnt.

damn this ownage is too easy, just stop posting man

[mazdaru]

so floyd was in danger of not making weight?

how about you answer that for me and ill respond to your answer

[mazdaru]

Boy that is the popular excuse isnt it. If Paq fought Jmm again (and I think he should), and knocked him silly, Mayweather would claim "its because I softened him up", and all Mayweathers fans would believe him. The bottom line is Mayweather went twelve rounds against DLH and never hurt him, Paq mad him quit on his stool and retire. Mayweather took 10 rounds to knock out Hatton, Paq crushed him in 2, Mayweather went twelve rounds against JMM and knocked him down once, Paq went 24 rounds and knocked him down four times. Paq is a destroyer, Mayweather and his fans refuse to admit it.

really, b.c floyd buckled and nearly dropped DLH TWICE while floyds back was on the ropes, and floyd never loaded up on his punches

haha, fail

go to 6:36 dumb dumb

[Hannibal Barca]

youre a fail. fcuk outa here. i never said the stipulation didnt exist and floyds stipulation is baseless.

there's a thin line where you can go overboard with these stipulations. my point is that pacquiao didn't, and floyd did. floyd asking for something out the ordinary coz he assumes and has a "hunch" pacquiao is on something is a baseless stipulation.

So more stringent doping policies are a bad thing?