Vitali was #1 at a time.
You're being obnoxious as I suspected.
Now I'll explain the current state of things. If #1 beats #3, 6, 8 and 9 and #2 beats the prior #2, and #5, 7 and 10 it means that #2 has done **** and gets no credit? (I made up the numbers BTW but I think they were more or less like that).
Even if he's not #1 now he still gets credit because he beat top fighters in dominating fashion. Of course if he fought the #1 guy and beat him it would be better, but that doesn't mean what he has done isn't good.
And now I have to go, we'll continue this discussion later, when hopefully you'll stop answering my questions with more questions and being obnoxious in general, here I though we were having an intelligent and civil discussion, silly me.
You're being obnoxious as I suspected.
Now I'll explain the current state of things. If #1 beats #3, 6, 8 and 9 and #2 beats the prior #2, and #5, 7 and 10 it means that #2 has done **** and gets no credit? (I made up the numbers BTW but I think they were more or less like that).
Even if he's not #1 now he still gets credit because he beat top fighters in dominating fashion. Of course if he fought the #1 guy and beat him it would be better, but that doesn't mean what he has done isn't good.
And now I have to go, we'll continue this discussion later, when hopefully you'll stop answering my questions with more questions and being obnoxious in general, here I though we were having an intelligent and civil discussion, silly me.
Comment