I've posted the below content in another thread, but no one responded as the thread was already chewed over and done with (sorry Anorak)
Thus I decided to make it a new thread and wanted to hear your opinions
The below is not meant to offend anyone, not Klitschko fans/haters, nor Hopkins, where I just used him as an example. Here it goes:
_________________________________________________
One thing that bothers me...
I don't mean the below thoughts to be racist, or to offend anyone.
But everyone always refers to Klitschko's as "Giants". "The reason they are so good is because of their size." "If they were smaller they would be crushed" and etc..
Yes, those are all true statements. But how come their disadvantages are never taken into consideration.
It is a known fact that black people have much better stamina, naturally more athletic, have better chins, don't get cut as easily, and last but not least breath easier due to bigger nostrils.
Do you think all that equates to size advantage?
How really big are the Klitschko's compared to their competition?
I did a little statistics where I took Top 20 guys from Boxrec and averaged their height and weight. Here are my findings below:
Vitali's Hight: +almost 4 inches above the competition
Vitali's Weight: +5.5lb above competition
Wlad's Hight: + almost 2.5 inches above competition
Wlad's Weight: -3.5lb above competition
Is that such a huge difference, especially in Wlad's case? He is only 2.5 inches taller on average than the rest. And is 3.5 pound lighter. Most of us are saying he should still drop 5-10 pounds. So are they really that much "bigger" and do they really have all that advantage everyone talks about?
I did the same statistics for our P4P King: Bernard Hopkins and his division.
Hopkins is also like Wlad is almost 2.5 inches above the rest in the division. (Weight of course is not a factor)
How come no one is saying "Hopkins is so good because of his size"?
Your thoughts.
Thus I decided to make it a new thread and wanted to hear your opinions
The below is not meant to offend anyone, not Klitschko fans/haters, nor Hopkins, where I just used him as an example. Here it goes:
_________________________________________________
One thing that bothers me...
I don't mean the below thoughts to be racist, or to offend anyone.
But everyone always refers to Klitschko's as "Giants". "The reason they are so good is because of their size." "If they were smaller they would be crushed" and etc..
Yes, those are all true statements. But how come their disadvantages are never taken into consideration.
It is a known fact that black people have much better stamina, naturally more athletic, have better chins, don't get cut as easily, and last but not least breath easier due to bigger nostrils.
Do you think all that equates to size advantage?
How really big are the Klitschko's compared to their competition?
I did a little statistics where I took Top 20 guys from Boxrec and averaged their height and weight. Here are my findings below:
Vitali's Hight: +almost 4 inches above the competition
Vitali's Weight: +5.5lb above competition
Wlad's Hight: + almost 2.5 inches above competition
Wlad's Weight: -3.5lb above competition
Is that such a huge difference, especially in Wlad's case? He is only 2.5 inches taller on average than the rest. And is 3.5 pound lighter. Most of us are saying he should still drop 5-10 pounds. So are they really that much "bigger" and do they really have all that advantage everyone talks about?
I did the same statistics for our P4P King: Bernard Hopkins and his division.
Hopkins is also like Wlad is almost 2.5 inches above the rest in the division. (Weight of course is not a factor)
How come no one is saying "Hopkins is so good because of his size"?
Your thoughts.

Comment