Comments Thread For: Eddie Chambers Talks Klitschko Fight, Pacquiao, Floyd

[Pirao]

Chambers could of Povetkin again and try to avenge his loss but he chose to fight W.Klitschko for the title. You think Chambers made the right decision?

I think yes, title fights first, avenge losses later. Plus Povetkin is the IBF mandatiory so if Chambers wins they'll have to fight again.

[Tiozzo]

Like Ward and Hopkins do, just to put a few examples?

Exactly. Another idiotic poster (Edgar) thinks I don't know it's part of the game to clinch. The difference with Wlad is that he refuses to fight inside, at all. As soon as his opponent is too close, he grabs him. It's dull, but it's smart. With that reach of his, why would he fight inside ? So Chambers's job, or any Wlad's opponent, is to find a way to land punches in close without being clinched.

Furthermore, when a boxer uses the clinch too much, he should be deducted a point.