Is Pacquiao’s career complete if he doesn’t fight Mayweather?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • .PrettyBoy32.
    The definition of a *****
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 2399
    • 135
    • 94
    • 10,040

    #1

    Is Pacquiao’s career complete if he doesn’t fight Mayweather?

    Is Pacquiao’s career complete if he doesn’t fight Mayweather?
    February 27th, 2010
    By Esteban Garduno


    In the teleconference call yesterday, World Boxing Organization welterweight champion Manny Pacquiao said the following: “I believe I don’t really need to fight Mayweather because what I have actually done in boxing right now, I think is good enough for me.” But is Pacquiao’s career really complete if he doesn’t fight Mayweather? I really don’t think it is. Pacquiao fought few recognizable opponents from the start of his career until he fought Marco Antonio Barrera for the first time in 2003. By then, Pacquiao had been fighting for eight years and had won titles in the flyweight and super bantamweight divisions.
    However, didn’t take on anyone worth mentioning until he fought a battle scared Barrera in 2003. By that time in Barrera’s career, he had been through two grueling wars against Erik Morales. Pacquiao stopped Barrera in the 11th round. After that fight, Pacquiao fought to a 12 round draw with Juan Manuel Marquez. Beyond that fight, Pacquiao fought two more bouts against Morales, another fight against Barrera, which wasn’t really needed given the one-sided first bout between them.

    In 2008, Pacquiao won a controversial 12 round split decision over Marquez in a rematch, a fight in which many people still think Marquez won. Pacquiao never gave Marquez a rematch. Pacquiao fought David Diaz in 2008, but he wasn’t considered to be the best fighter in the lightweight division at the time. Pacquiao then fought and beat and old Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton and then most recently Miguel Cotto.

    Those wins were good. However, none of those fighters were considered to be the best in their divisions at the time that Pacquiao fought them. De La Hoya was old, Hatton was more or less shot, and Cotto still hadn’t looked the same after taking a terrifying beating at the hands of Antonio Margarito in 2008.

    As such, I think even with a win over Joshua Clottey, Pacquiao’s next opponent for March 13th, he needs a win over Floyd Mayweather Jr. to ensure he has a lasting legacy. The wins over Diaz, Barrera, Morales (who beat Pacquiao in their first fight), Marquez (a questionable draw and a controversial win), De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto just aren’t enough in my view to make me think that Pacquiao’s career is complete.

    He just doesn’t have enough wins over fighters that were truly considered to be the very best in their weight divisions for me to see Pacquiao’s legacy as a shining one. Hatton, Cotto, Morales, Barrera and the questionable win over Marquez just isn’t enough.

    Pacquiao needs to give a rematch to Marquez, still fight Mayweather and ideally Shane Mosley for me to even consider Pacquiao as a great fighter. Without wins over those fighters, then I see Pacquiao as merely a good fighter but not a great one. Unless Pacquiao can find his way into and out of those fights without losing, then I don’t rate Pacquiao as one of the best fighters of all time. I see Pacquiao as having lost to Marquez twice, and I think Mayweather and Mosley would likely beat Pacquiao as well if given the chance.
  • .PrettyBoy32.
    The definition of a *****
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 2399
    • 135
    • 94
    • 10,040

    #2
    Bump .....,.....

    Comment

    • flexxx145
      Banned
      • Dec 2009
      • 2085
      • 87
      • 106
      • 2,291

      #3
      Great post !

      Comment

      • La_Vibora
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 1816
        • 76
        • 27
        • 9,583

        #4
        I don't think either's career will be complete without the other imho. Yes, they both will have nice resumes, both should be hall of famers, but to truly put a stamp on their careers they need each other.

        Comment

        • Blue Heffner
          Blackjack
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 15935
          • 373
          • 323
          • 24,659

          #5
          They should want to fight each other. Every sport has big events and May vs Pac would be one the biggest fights in history. And it'll be sad for us to talk about what should have happened, if it doesn't...they both need it for their career and for the sport of boxing.

          Comment

          • S A M U R A I
            Bulletproof
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 181694
            • 1,495
            • 1,324
            • 1,419,318

            #6
            Pacquiao's career is complete without Floyd. It was complete ages ago, only now he's icing the cake.

            That article is ****. Pacquiao is already an ATG. Yet the author is so dumb he doesn't consider him great? **** outta here.



            100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

            Comment

            • Measy1749
              Banned
              • Feb 2010
              • 317
              • 9
              • 0
              • 363

              #7
              he's never beat a great fighter when both of them were in their prime. neither has mayweather. they must fight each other for that to happen and for either of them to be great imo.

              Comment

              • V.WEBB
                CBVM
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 14329
                • 621
                • 174
                • 21,453

                #8
                Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                Pacquiao's career is complete without Floyd. It was complete ages ago, only now he's icing the cake.

                That article is ****. Pacquiao is already an ATG. Yet the author is so dumb he doesn't consider him great? **** outta here.
                He needs to fight Floyd and vice versa.

                Comment

                • Blue Heffner
                  Blackjack
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 15935
                  • 373
                  • 323
                  • 24,659

                  #9
                  Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                  Pacquiao's career is complete without Floyd. It was complete ages ago, only now he's icing the cake.
                  We can argue that both fighter's careers are complete. But wouldn't the icing on the cake be them fighting each other? It'll have a great impact of the sport.

                  Comment

                  • S A M U R A I
                    Bulletproof
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 181694
                    • 1,495
                    • 1,324
                    • 1,419,318

                    #10
                    Originally posted by COACH-WEBB
                    He needs to fight Floyd and vice versa.
                    Neither "needs" to fight the other, it's just that the public wants it. If they don't fight, nothing really changes. It's not like all of a sudden everyone will disregard what both have already achieved. If Pacquiao hadn't gone up in weight only about 6 people in the entire world would even think about him fighting Mayweather. It'd just be a fantasy fight in their minds.

                    Both are ATG's. All Time GREATS. How does a boxing journalist come up with the idea that either one of them isn't great? Weirdness. He's welcome to his opinion, but he doesn't appear to understand the term "ATG". I can't stand Mayweather, I think he's a pansy, a weirdo, and an awful example of a human being, yet I would never deny that he isn't great.



                    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP