Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
The 'Non Stop Boxing' forum is visible to all users. To see additional forums please
register
or login.
Carl Froch vs Paul Wiliams would probably be a really great fight...
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
2
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
template
Next
SpinDoctor
QUAD DIAMOND CHAMPION
Join Date:
Feb 2010
Posts:
1735
Received
77
Given
46
Points:
11,256
Share
Tweet
#1
Carl Froch vs Paul Wiliams would probably be a really great fight...
02-27-2010, 03:23 AM
Not sure how well williams would do up 8 more pounds...But this would be a pretty hard ****ing, non stop action fight.
Ch@mpBox@PR
Banned
Join Date:
Feb 2008
Posts:
21432
Received
432
Given
279
Points:
22,261
Share
Tweet
#2
02-27-2010, 03:26 AM
Froch is simply too big for Williams!!!
Comment
Post
Cancel
Clyde Barrow
King of the Castle
Join Date:
May 2009
Posts:
6586
Received
760
Given
1,027
Points:
13,529
Share
Tweet
#3
02-27-2010, 03:26 AM
Williams gets KTFO. He won't be effective at 168 at all.
Comment
Post
Cancel
SpinDoctor
QUAD DIAMOND CHAMPION
Join Date:
Feb 2010
Posts:
1735
Received
77
Given
46
Points:
11,256
Share
Tweet
#4
02-27-2010, 03:30 AM
Originally posted by
Ch@mpBox@PR
Froch is simply too big for Williams!!!
They are the exact same size, froch just has a little more meat on his bones.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Ch@mpBox@PR
Banned
Join Date:
Feb 2008
Posts:
21432
Received
432
Given
279
Points:
22,261
Share
Tweet
#5
02-27-2010, 03:32 AM
Originally posted by
SpinDoctor
They are the exact same size, froch just has a little more meat on his bones.
They are not!! Froch is the bigger man.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Dambala
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Jul 2008
Posts:
2934
Received
69
Given
101
Points:
10,163
Share
Tweet
#6
02-27-2010, 04:00 AM
Williams has no business above MW.
Comment
Post
Cancel
black.ink
Banned
Join Date:
Oct 2007
Posts:
4214
Received
213
Given
165
Points:
19,555
Share
Tweet
#7
02-27-2010, 04:41 AM
Williams wouldn't last more then 5 rounds.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Clegg
Banned
Join Date:
Mar 2008
Posts:
24673
Received
3,726
Given
2,307
Points:
233,274
Share
Tweet
#8
02-27-2010, 04:45 AM
Originally posted by
SpinDoctor
They are the exact same size, froch just has a little more meat on his bones.
Williams is taller with a longer reach, but I'd think that Froch is physically stronger, hits harder, takes a better punch and has broader shoulders, chest, legs etc.
Comment
Post
Cancel
bojangles1987
bo jungle
Join Date:
Jul 2009
Posts:
41118
Received
1,326
Given
357
Points:
63,028
Share
Tweet
#9
02-27-2010, 05:44 AM
Paul doesn't hit hard enough, Froch would eat him alive.
Comment
Post
Cancel
wazaa.
Banned
Join Date:
Feb 2010
Posts:
13956
Received
773
Given
643
Points:
15,658
Share
Tweet
#10
02-27-2010, 05:45 AM
Williams would school Froch even worse then Dirrell schooled Froch
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment