Bernard Hopkins Execution

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Run
    Outlaw
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 56188
    • 2,588
    • 4,569
    • 76,412

    #1

    Bernard Hopkins Execution

    It seems the Executioner has been getting bad press as a fighter due to his style as of late. There are too many people who accuse Hopkins of being a pure boxer.......when he is far from that. Before his fight with Trinidad, all he ever did was fight toe to toe basically. He is one of the best inside fighters in the game, yet nobody gives him credit for that side of his ability. I just dont understand. Did these people start watching him fight right after he beat Trinidad and he recieved the mainstream exposure? One poster I saw....said he ran from Morrad Hakkar the entire fight. How is that possible...when the ref warned Hakkar that he would take a point off for not fighting.

    Did these people miss his fights with Holmes, Echols, Roy Jones, and literally everyone else he faced before...or what?

    Anyone have any answers?



    Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #2
    I think a lot of casual fans didn't really see him fight before the Trinidad fight, and call him a boring boxer because he's not a one punch KO artist.

    In a word: ignorance.

    Hopkins is a slick, savvy pro who's a violent and rugged inside fighter. He will beat and break fighters down with a mix of intelligent boxing and rugged tactics. Whatever works.

    IMO, until he loses or retires, he's got a strangle hold on being the best fighter in the sport.

    Comment

    • Run
      Outlaw
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2005
      • 56188
      • 2,588
      • 4,569
      • 76,412

      #3
      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no

      In a word: ignorance.

      Hopkins is a slick, savvy pro who's a violent and rugged inside fighter. He will beat and break fighters down with a mix of intelligent boxing and rugged tactics. Whatever works.
      .
      Exactly....he is one of the most rugged inside fighters I have ever seen...and he chased opponents around the ring time after time. Nowadays....people are basically discrediting him for those fights because of the way he ran from Eastman. LOL.



      Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

      Comment

      • Floydmayweather
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 2020
        • 46
        • 4
        • 8,618

        #4
        I never was a big fan of Hopkins style, and i think the same thing holds true with other boxing fans. The difference for me being that i box i appreciate his skills but respect and appeal are different.

        Comment

        • Run
          Outlaw
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2005
          • 56188
          • 2,588
          • 4,569
          • 76,412

          #5
          Originally posted by Floydmayweather
          I never was a big fan of Hopkins style, .
          And what style would that be? He has used like 5 different styles in every fight I have ever seen. He is more of a toe to toe fighter than the slick boxer as of late.



          Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

          Comment

          • Floydmayweather
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 2020
            • 46
            • 4
            • 8,618

            #6
            I really dont like his tactics in the ring but he is hell of a fighter.

            Comment

            • Tha Greatest
              boxingscene legend
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 15748
              • 616
              • 963
              • 24,468

              #7
              This is Hopkins era

              He would rip u up brawl or box..

              Comment

              • Super_Lightweight
                Jesus of Nazareth P4P
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 7746
                • 452
                • 556
                • 15,482

                #8
                hmm

                Hopkins impresses me. I don't like him, and obviously in his old age he has become more cautious...but people should watch his fight with Roy. Bernard had no chance to outbox Roy so he fought him hard and he won 3-4 rounds doing that and was competitive. Roy's most competitive fight was with Bernard in my opinion.

                Bernard outmsarted and outboxed De La Hoya when most thought Bernard would try to smash him. He surprised a few people in that one although many I'm sure felt he could do whatever he wanted to De La Hoya. But if you thought that, you thought that because you know Hopkins is a jack of all trades.

                His demolition of Tito pretty much showed how complete of a fighter Hopkins is. His abuse of Joppy was just plain sickening. I didn't see his fights with Echols, but Echols was a BIG puncher in his prime and was a very good fighter, and Hopkins beat him at his own game.

                Comment

                • guru
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 2800
                  • 69
                  • 0
                  • 8,993

                  #9
                  i dont have a problem with nard, he does what he has to win... sometimes he can be boring.... i think he's going to lose to taylor though

                  Comment

                  • Run
                    Outlaw
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 56188
                    • 2,588
                    • 4,569
                    • 76,412

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Floydmayweather
                    I really dont like his tactics in the ring but he is hell of a fighter.
                    For sure. He is definitely a dirty fighter, and has been known for that. My point of this thread....was just wanting to know why people think he is merely an outside boxer...who distances himself with the jab like Winky Wright does. That is so not true.....because he can brawl as well. On another thread....I saw someone type something to this effect:

                    "Hopkins would get knocked out. The reason why people rate his chin so high...is because he never gets hit. All he does is run away from his opponents."

                    To me.....that is ****** as hell, and warrants blasphemy in a boxing religious sense. That poster is one of the people I want answers from.



                    Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP