The only think i'm saying is that don't be saying that manny is the greatest boxer of all time, He still hasn't proved that yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How much better would Pacquiao be if he had an amateur career?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by rabagiyo View PostInstead of fighting oscar de la hoya and shot ricky hatton he could've fought any other one instead of these losers. How bout back with marquez? Instead of having a third fight with him and having a great trilogy, He decided to move up in weight to fight a bum instead of a real warrior.
Comment
-
-
I think a big part of what actually makes Pacquiao so good now is that he didn't have an amatuer career. He starting fighting just to survive and that mentality is what makes him so good. He learned to become a fighter first and a boxer second. If he would have been an amatuer, it would probably mean he would have had a better up bringing, he wouldn't have been dirt poor and he would have competed in amatuer fighting as a pass time or hobby. Instead he got into the ring to fight for his next meal which gives him the mental edge over many of the top tier fighters right now. The guys that prioritize the paydays before fighting will never have the mental edge Manny has.
This is also why I think Clottey is such a dangerous fight for him, he's another guy that grew up poor so appreciates everything he gets. This is what makes Clottey so iron chinned, the mans got an incredible will to fight and survive.
Clottey's only downfall is he never had a great coach, where as Manny was fortunate enough to link up with Freddie Roach.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rabagiyo View PostInstead of fighting oscar de la hoya and shot ricky hatton he could've fought any other one instead of these losers. How bout back with marquez? Instead of having a third fight with him and having a great trilogy, He decided to move up in weight to fight a bum instead of a real warrior.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kryptonian View PostI think a big part of what actually makes Pacquiao so good now is that he didn't have an amatuer career. He starting fighting just to survive and that mentality is what makes him so good. He learned to become a fighter first and a boxer second. If he would have been an amatuer, it would probably mean he would have had a better up bringing, he wouldn't have been dirt poor and he would have competed in amatuer fighting as a pass time or hobby. Instead he got into the ring to fight for his next meal which gives him the mental edge over many of the top tier fighters right now. The guys that prioritize the paydays before fighting will never have the mental edge Manny has.
This is also why I think Clottey is such a dangerous fight for him, he's another guy that grew up poor so appreciates everything he gets. This is what makes Clottey so iron chinned, the mans got an incredible will to fight and survive.
Clottey's only downfall is he never had a great coach, where as Manny was fortunate enough to link up with Freddie Roach.
Comment
-
-
Good question. I'd like to see how good he would have been if he got with Roach in the beginning of his career. Amateurs generally are just learning the craft and alot of pros have said that it is a completely different experience turning pro.
Comment
-
Maybe he would have learned the art of fair play and wouldn't have become a steroid user in his late 20's.
Comment
Comment