Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s Undefeated Record Appreciation Thread

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Wow you rank Pac higher than all do... But, if that is the case then you know what I have no problem with you ranking Floyd that high if Floyd beats Pac...

I do have a problem with posters who don't rank Pac that high, who don't give Pac a chance and then go on and say that it was a great win for Floyd. If you are fighting a guy who has zero chance in winning then how can you get credit for a victory? I have no problem with the posters who give Pac a chance of winning and those same posters giving Floyd credit... Like I will, I will give Floyd tremendous credit for beating Pac. I do have a problem with the opposite posters. The one who just plain out diminishes Pac and give Pac no shot and then act like it is a great win...

Whether a Floyd fan think Pac has no chance or not doesn't change the fact that Pac IS the P4P number 1 in the world.

I dont give Pavlik much of a chance vs, Williams so that means Paul gets no credit for beating the Lineal Champ?

[Sweet Jesus]

The Internet is a serious place, LOL @ that ***** thinking he's a G

****ing fruitcake

No going back now buddy. No going back now.

[UnDeniable]

Wow you rank Pac higher than all do... But, if that is the case then you know what I have no problem with you ranking Floyd that high if Floyd beats Pac...

I do have a problem with posters who don't rank Pac that high, who don't give Pac a chance and then go on and say that it was a great win for Floyd. If you are fighting a guy who has zero chance in winning then how can you get credit for a victory? I have no problem with the posters who give Pac a chance of winning and those same posters giving Floyd credit... Like I will, I will give Floyd tremendous credit for beating Pac. I do have a problem with the opposite posters. The one who just plain out diminishes Pac and give Pac no shot and then act like it is a great win...

i dig what you saying but thats NSB

Fraud this, Fraud that, Steroids this, Steroids that

After the fight *****s will praise Pacquiao if Floyd wins and *******s will praise Floyd if Pacquiao wins

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Can anybody just answer this question. Since I guess it was too dificult for Burner to answer...

If fighter A fights fighter B. And, fighter B has zero chance in beating fighter A. Isn't fighter A cherrypicking? If not then what is?

I already answered you a page or so back.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

If fighter A is fighting fighter B... And, fighter B has zero chance in beating fighter A... Isn't fighter A cherrypicking? If that is not cherrypicking then what is?

Where exactly would you rank him amongst the best lefties ever?

I dont know how you can cherry pick the P4P Number 1. Thats called fighting the best.

Damn good question there are so many, Hagler, Pernell, Camacho, Winky, Ramirez, Nunn, Galaxy, Byrd, Tendler, Saldivar....etc. I'll have to put a list together I'll get back to you on that one homie.

This is what I said.

[jrosales13]

Also what I don't get is why Burner wants to see Floyd vs Pac if he believe Pac has no chance of beating him. To me that would be a senseless fight.

I'm a pac fan and before Valero's last fight, I thought Valero would have no chance so I wouldn't even want to see a potential fight between the two. Same with Marquez. IMO Marquez gets destroyed within 8 rounds by pac, which is why I wouldn't want to see the fight.

I actually want to see Pac fight fights that I feel he has a great chance of losing. Mosley, May, Margarito and truth be told Joshua Clottey. All of those guys have the tools to beat Pac, which is why as a fan, I want to see them happen. I want to see Pac in toss up fight because when he prevails....It's just a testament to his greatness.

Exactly... My favore fighter of all time was Tito and I only wanted to see him fight the fights that he had a good to great chance of loosing... I never wanted to see him fight against a fighters who had zero chance in beating him... And, when he did fight those fighters I never acted like if they were good wins...

[UnDeniable]

No going back now buddy. No going back now.

**** off...

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Exactly... My favore fighter of all time was Tito and I only wanted to see him fight the fights that he had a good to great chance of loosing... I never wanted to see him fight against a fighters who had zero chance in beating him... And, when he did fight those fighters I never acted like if they were good wins...

Dude are seriously telling me that Im wrong for wanting to watch Pac vs. Floyd? Man like I told Osiris Hell Im pumped for Saul Alvarez vs. Matt Hatton. Im a BOXING fan. Anyone who doesnt want to see Pac vs. Floyd is a joke.

[jrosales13]

Whether a Floyd fan think Pac has no chance or not doesn't change the fact that Pac IS the P4P number 1 in the world.

I dont give Pavlik much of a chance vs, Williams so that means Paul gets no credit for beating the Lineal Champ?

Do you give Pac credit for beating Cotto? Remember Cotto was in the P4P rankings... And, if you answer dishonestly I can go back and bump what you originally answered. If P4P meant **** with Pac-Cotto then P4P means **** for Floyd-Pac...

And, again if fighter A fights fighter B. And, fighter B has zero chance in beating fighter A. Isn't fighter A cherrypicking? If not then what is considered cherrypicking?

[jrosales13]

This is what I said.

That is not answering my question...