Boxrec has Valero @ 20 p4p and bradley @ 25 p4p.......

**P.WILL** · 02-13-2010, 01:57 PM

I happen to disagree with those rankings and believe Bradley should be higher. I advise Valero to stay at 135 because I believe Bradley will wreck him.

**Clegg** · 02-13-2010, 01:57 PM

Bradley is one of the best 10 boxers in the world IMO.

Valero...maybe about 25th or so.

**Throwingbombs** · 02-13-2010, 01:58 PM

Boxrec also has Bernard Hopkins as the best p4p fighter in the world....

**catalinul** · 02-13-2010, 01:59 PM

Obviously those rankings are garbage.

Bradley is ranked good or maybe even underranked.

Valero at 20 is plain out wrong.

**fightingfigs** · 02-13-2010, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by SpinDoctor

Let them two have at it!

GEICO!
GEICO!
GEICO!

Now that is some total bull****, I bet Bradley couldve KOed everyone that Valero has fought as well

**ny123** · 02-13-2010, 02:00 PM

Boxrec is ****

**Jim Jeffries** · 02-13-2010, 02:00 PM

Wlad at #4 and Vitali at #5.

Be interesting to see what type of formula they use.

**SpinDoctor** · 02-13-2010, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by Clegg

Bradley is one of the best 10 boxers in the world IMO.

Both of them need to beat some A class opponents to get on there.

Bradley has only beat 3 B class opponents in Witter, Holt and peterson in which all fights went the distance

Valero has beat 2 B class opponents in pitalua and de marco and has a weaker resume but has knocked everyone he has faced.

I think both of these dudes need each other.

**-Boxzilla-** · 02-13-2010, 02:00 PM

ya i wouldnt rate valero higher ... maybe its cause hes a 2 weight titlist? i dunno

Boxrec has Valero @ 20 p4p and bradley @ 25 p4p.......