Some people need to realise A GOOD ATHLETE, DOES NOT ALWAYS A GOOD BOXER MAKE.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jim Jeffries
    rugged individualist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20740
    • 1,376
    • 2,868
    • 54,838

    #11
    Originally posted by The Gambler1981
    Being a good athlete does not make you a good fight but being a good athlete is part of being a good fighter~
    There you go, I knew you'd finally get it.

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 521
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #12
      Originally posted by £Hank$Moody€
      There you go, I knew you'd finally get it.
      Huh? I replied right after I read your BS, you need to be a great athlete to be a great fighter point blank. You can be an athlete and not be a great fighter but you can not be a great fighter without being a great athlete~

      Comment

      • Jim Jeffries
        rugged individualist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20740
        • 1,376
        • 2,868
        • 54,838

        #13
        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        Huh? I replied right after I read your BS, you need to be a great athlete to be a great fighter point blank. You can be an athlete and not be a great fighter but you can not be a great fighter without being a great athlete~
        All you need to know is that this

        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        I don't understand when the thought process started that you did not have to be a great athlete to be heavyweight champ.
        is not what the thread was about, okay champ?

        Thanks for playing.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 521
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #14
          Originally posted by £Hank$Moody€
          All you need to know is that this



          is not what the thread was about, okay champ?

          Thanks for playing.
          My point stands if that is all you can say.

          Comment

          • Jim Jeffries
            rugged individualist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20740
            • 1,376
            • 2,868
            • 54,838

            #15
            Originally posted by The Gambler1981
            My point stands if that is all you can say.
            You mean there was a point in that mess? Thread related?

            Comment

            • Earl-Hickey
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 29031
              • 2,832
              • 1,384
              • 297,750

              #16
              Sorry guys, i got logged off.

              I didnt say "you don't have to be a great athlete to be a great boxer"

              but if you are a great athlete, that doesn't automatically make you a great boxer.

              Comment

              • The Gambler1981
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 25961
                • 521
                • 774
                • 49,039

                #17
                Originally posted by £Hank$Moody€
                You mean there was a point in that mess? Thread related?
                I find it hard to believe you are the one talking about points since what you are saying is pointless~ try again X-Files~

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 521
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
                  Sorry guys, i got logged off.

                  I didnt say "you don't have to be a great athlete to be a great boxer"

                  but if you are a great athlete, that doesn't automatically make you a great boxer.
                  But you need to be a great athlete to be a great fighter so it is obviously important, no way to downplay it.

                  Comment

                  • Jim Jeffries
                    rugged individualist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20740
                    • 1,376
                    • 2,868
                    • 54,838

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
                    Sorry guys, i got logged off.

                    I didnt say "you don't have to be a great athlete to be a great boxer"

                    but if you are a great athlete, that doesn't automatically make you a great boxer.
                    Exactly, but then this guy goes off on a tangent, then finally agrees, then goes back on the tangent.

                    Lamar Odom would be literally killed by either Klitschko, that much is obvious by just looking at his neck and forearms.

                    [IMG]http://www.*************.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/PT24934.jpg[/IMG]

                    Comment

                    • Earl-Hickey
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 29031
                      • 2,832
                      • 1,384
                      • 297,750

                      #20
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      But you need to be a great athlete to be a great fighter so it is obviously important, no way to downplay it.
                      Yeah, the point of the thread though, is that NFL and pro footballers wouldnt automatically be good boxers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP