Vernon Forrest vs. Miguel Cotto @ 147 in their primes.

**El Castigador** · 02-12-2010, 03:59 PM

Forrest by KO.

The jab, speed, power, boxing ability. Too much for Cotto and his chin.

Ray* · 02-12-2010, 04:00 PM

WOW That would have been a great fight, Am leaning towards Cotto.

**mangler jr** · 02-12-2010, 04:03 PM

Forrest would KILL Cotto.

People forget just how damn good Vernon was.

Especially at 47'.

**boxasmash** · 02-12-2010, 04:12 PM

Wow.... Vernon Forrest was a beast but Cotto in 2007/2008 was ridiculous. I'll pass!

**Jim Jeffries** · 02-12-2010, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by boxasmash

Wow.... Vernon Forrest was a beast but Cotto in 2007/2008 was ridiculous. I'll pass!

Why didn't Floyd fight that guy?

**boxasmash** · 02-12-2010, 04:21 PM

Why do you think?

**Pullcounter** · 02-12-2010, 04:22 PM

forrest will beat cotto. forrest jab is better than cotto's jab. cotto is too orthodox, forrest should be able to outbox him. in the latter rounds cotto willl run and forrest won't be able to stop him. Decision for forrest.

**El Castigador** · 02-12-2010, 04:23 PM

Originally posted by �Hank$Moody�

Why didn't Floyd fight that guy?

Why didnt Cotto fight Floyd.

**Bram** · 02-12-2010, 04:33 PM

I think I might go with Cotto on this one (after much deliberation), by decision. I think he could get and stay inside on Forrest and work him over a bit, but if Forrest chopped him up from the outside, I wouldn't at all be surprised.

Vernon Forrest vs. Miguel Cotto @ 147 in their primes.