Mayweather Jr. 'I've dominated the sport...

[apokalips]

A rematch with De La Hoya? Haters need to read off the same page....people were cussing him for thinking about taking that fight before and I've still seen people say he was ducking this guy to try fight DLH etc, now he was ducking a DLH rematch?

Come on now!

This is poor journalism, how can a "journalist" be such a hater...pathetic really.

[Foodie One]

another LADY STAN thread written by the EXAMINER. Something never change.

Oh C'mon Coach, first you complain that I post too much Pacquiao stuff and now you complain that I post Mayweather related news. You can't be pleased. JAT

[mazdaru]

We Will See If He Beats Mosely then Fights Pac and Cotto....other then that hes just come out of retirement and Beated JMM which is good but he needs to Prove Himself against Mosely..

dude, stop talking about cotto. floyd isnt going to waste his time on that shell and i dont want to see it.

if pac wasnt the duck that he is, we could have been getting ready for a May-pac showdown

[1nonlymre]

ok smart guy go to WADA's site and see if its banned

do a search for xylocaine or lidocaine in their 2010 banned substances list and see if you find anything

here:

http://www.wada-ama.org/

that better for you?

Works for me. I wasn't dogging you, just stating that wikipedia, although easy to refer to, is not the most reliable source out there when it's open to editing by anyone. Shoot, even what I added lacked a period. Obviously you didn't do this, but it just really bothers me when folks take wikipedia as an end-all for information when it's, more than anything, a "word of mouth" type of inquiry.

[Biolink]

It's ridiculous to say Marquez was an easy opponent. It's ok saying that after Floyd's dominated him. But before the fight, you had guys like Roach saying Floyd may have picked the wrong opponent for a tune-up fight. The article makes it sounds as if Marquez is some bum. Crazy talk.

Only an easy opponent after he schools the **** out of them.

I'm still looking for that old thread that had a collection of dumb threads on Boxing Scene. Dumb **** like Gatti would be too much for Floyd. Baldomir would be too much for Floyd. Zab would be too much for Floyd. He schools all 3, and now people make up more excuses.

The hate for this man is astounding.

[Foodie One]

So then you feel fighters like Gatti were cheaters? If you are staright forward with the comish and let them know you use this to train and follow the rules how is that cheating? The guys who played in the superbowl last night that had shots to numb pain that both the team and nfl are aware of are cheating too then? Pac is a saint in boxing in your eyes, but your reaching with agenda these days.

Think about this: If you are able to be "Numb" to the pain of getting hit numerous times, doesn't that in itself makes you a "Cheater" due to the fact that you can go on and on and on without feeling pain? To me this kind of advantage over your opponent is in fact "Cheating."

[Eaner0919]

Works for me. I wasn't dogging you, just stating that wikipedia, although easy to refer to, is not the most reliable source out there when it's open to editing by anyone. Shoot, even what I added lacked a period. Obviously you didn't do this, but it just really bothers me when folks take wikipedia as an end-all for information when it's, more than anything, a "word of mouth" type of inquiry.

fair enough and apologies.

[M.I.C.]

This thread DOES NOT FAIL!

You are "DUCKING" my question.

DO YOU THINK THAT THE USE OF XYLOCAINE BY FIGHTERS GIVE THEM THE ADVANTAGE OVER OPPONENTS BY MAKING THEM ABLE TO ABSORB MORE PUNISHMENT WITHOUT FEELING PAIN THUS MAKING THEM ESSENTIALLY "CHEATERS" OF THIS SPORT.

ALL OTHER POSTERS REPLYING IN THIS THREAD PLEASE ANSWER MY QUESTION!

Lets say an opponent Mayweather is facing does not have a problem with their hands being in pain. So how does xylocaine give Mayweather an advantage over them?

[El Castigador]

Only an easy opponent after he schools the **** out of them.

I'm still looking for that old thread that had a collection of dumb threads on Boxing Scene. Dumb **** like Gatti would be too much for Floyd. Baldomir would be too much for Floyd. Zab would be too much for Floyd. He schools all 3, and now people make up more excuses.

The hate for this man is astounding.

Im about to bump it.

[M.I Truth ?]

Who knows why but the way I see it is that Mayweather and Pacquiao are both clean until it's proven that they're not. What I don't understand is that a lot of people who say Mayweather has accomplished similar feats as Pacquiao while moving up but Pacquiao is suspect and Mayweather isn't.

I accept that both are clean until otherwise proven. I also accept the idea of more strict testing. The reason people look at Pac and wonder more then Mayweather is becauae as Mayweather went up in weight his punches had less effect on bigger guys. It seems to be the opposite with Pac. I think it has a lot to do with Pac killing himself to make weight. Maybe he should have been fight at 140lbs sooner. . That said I still think he should take the test. Lady Fan(the thread starter) tries to bash Floyd at every chance with nonsense but will not accept any wrong doing from Pac. None of these guys are perfect. Fan of the sport before the fighter.