Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Will Fight Mayweather-Mosley Winner, Says Roach

[Cash Cow]

[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7421829]

I give him credit for taking risks. Floyd wouldn't fight any of those guys mentioned if they were still around in their primes and in his division.

Credit goes to a man for trying and failing, as opposed to a man who never tries because he is scared to fail.

ok now we are getting to the nucleus of your hate for Mayweather....about damn time...

so what top guys did he "duck"?

Margarito? the overrated/glorified bum who turned out to be a cheater?

Cotto? the guy Mayweather wanted to unify the 140lb titles with but THEIR promoter ARUM didnt want to put Cotto in with Floyd?

who else?...

i'll be waiting champ

[switchsouthpaw]

Reading this thread I came to a conclusion. No matter how much logic you employ, against a die hard pacman fan you he will never see the FACTS.

For example you have SouthPaw who say "he cherry picks his opponents since 2005". At the same time and on the same thread there have been post with Facts: That Floyd's camp issued a challenge to both Cotto and Mosley yrs ago. Your biased, so you will fail to realize after he left Bob Arum he had to make himself a major attraction. You say why did he retire, instead of fighting Cotto? Why did Cotto's camp turn down the fight twice?

Once Mayweather was able to build himself as a major attraction, everyone wants to come out of hiding and fight him for the big payday. So when you say it is not all about money, but about respect. You arguement fails.

You discredit all Mayweather opponents, so you must also feel the same way about Pacquiao opponents. If not than your whole arguement is flawed.

If Mayweather beats Shane your excuse will be is because Shane was old.
If Mayweather beats Pacquiao your excuse will be because his is the bigger fighter he was suppose to win.
If Mayweather beats Cotto, Clottey, and etc... your excuse will be they really never had a chance.

Do you realize the same time you try to discredit floyd, you praise him? Thats why I laugh at Floyd haters, because they always talk about he cherry picks opponents, he doesn't face a legit contenders, or he completely outclasses his opponents. <----- The reason why he completely outclasses his opponents is because he is on a whole other lvl.

If Mayweathers fights any of those names you've mentioned...win or lose he earns respect, including mine.

[Cash Cow]

the question is why is every ******* bashing Mayweather for asking for more testing when its his life on the line any boxer has the right to ask for more testing when its there life on the line in this case if Pac doesnt want to take the test then thats on him

This right here makes a ton of sense

[switchsouthpaw]

This right here makes a ton of sense

Lololol of course it makes sense to you...because he agrees with your point of view, stop living on knees.

[Cash Cow]

[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7421852]

Seriously is that really to confusing for you grasp the general points of my comment? lol yikes

well for someone who is typing in charades and smoke screens it can be misleading...and I am still waiting for you to answer post #151

you keep dodging the question.

[Cash Cow]

Reading this thread I came to a conclusion. No matter how much logic you employ, against a die hard pacman fan you he will never see the FACTS.

For example you have SouthPaw who say "he cherry picks his opponents since 2005". At the same time and on the same thread there have been post with Facts: That Floyd's camp issued a challenge to both Cotto and Mosley yrs ago. Your biased, so you will fail to realize after he left Bob Arum he had to make himself a major attraction. You say why did he retire, instead of fighting Cotto? Why did Cotto's camp turn down the fight twice?

Once Mayweather was able to build himself as a major attraction, everyone wants to come out of hiding and fight him for the big payday. So when you say it is not all about money, but about respect. You arguement fails.

You discredit all Mayweather opponents, so you must also feel the same way about Pacquiao opponents. If not than your whole arguement is flawed.

If Mayweather beats Shane your excuse will be is because Shane was old.
If Mayweather beats Pacquiao your excuse will be because his is the bigger fighter he was suppose to win.
If Mayweather beats Cotto, Clottey, and etc... your excuse will be they really never had a chance.

Do you realize the same time you try to discredit floyd, you praise him? Thats why I laugh at Floyd haters, because they always talk about he cherry picks opponents, he doesn't face a legit contenders, or he completely outclasses his opponents. <----- The reason why he completely outclasses his opponents is because he is on a whole other lvl.

WOW @ this post..true story////LMAO

*looks around for southpaw*

[switchsouthpaw]

[QUOTE=Easy Work Sr.;7421924]

well for someone who is typing in charades and smoke screens it can be misleading...and I am still waiting for you to answer post #151

you keep dodging the question.

You can type in charades and smoke screens? awesome.
By the way I especially like when a poster writes a comment that you agree with, then you get all bombastic with "LMFAO" "OWNED" "WOOOOWWW HANDJOB TO YOU FOR THAT COMMENT" .."YAAAAAYYYYY"....lol that ishh is hilarious.

[Cash Cow]

Reading this thread I came to a conclusion. No matter how much logic you employ, against a die hard pacman fan you he will never see the FACTS.

You discredit all Mayweather opponents, so you must also feel the same way about Pacquiao opponents. If not than your whole arguement is flawed.

If Mayweather beats Shane your excuse will be is because Shane was old.
If Mayweather beats Pacquiao your excuse will be because his is the bigger fighter he was suppose to win.
If Mayweather beats Cotto, Clottey, and etc... your excuse will be they really never had a chance.

Do you realize the same time you try to discredit floyd, you praise him? Thats why I laugh at Floyd haters, because they always talk about he cherry picks opponents, he doesn't face a legit contenders, or he completely outclasses his opponents. <----- The reason why he completely outclasses his opponents is because he is on a whole other lvl.

Naw you forgot that the 2lbs didnt make a difference in the Cotto-Pac fight but it made a difference in the Mayweather-Marquez fight

[Cash Cow]

[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7421976]

You can type in charades and smoke screens? awesome.

Typical nuthugger...there is NOT 1 post in this thread of yours that has any facts....

[norway]

Seriously alot of fools out there who believe in steroid Pac. If he's is so clean then agree to the ****..ng testing. Who the hell is Pacman ??? A tuff boxer who will go to school against Floyd. Lets all thank Floyd for applying pressure for real testing for illegal enhancing drugs.