Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Will Fight Mayweather-Mosley Winner, Says Roach
Collapse
-
-
[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7421769]yes I read it and it was very contradictory
on one hand you say... "I think overall Mosley deserves it but I'm basing that on hard work and the road he took to get there."
then you say...
"I framed my point around whether or not as some posters had suggested, that Mayweather should have gotten the nod."

so which one is it?Comment
-
he agreed to smaller gloves he agreed to smaller ring he agreed to money split he agreed to date of march cuz he wanted april or may.So Pacman is guilty of this fight not happening because he didn't agree to random ADITIONNAL blood tests??
What about "Mayweather didn't agreed to usual,commission's rules to fight Manny and the fight ain't happening because of his UNUSUAL DEMAND...."
Most of *****s would fight under the Nevada comission rules for 30 millions dollars.LOL
Your comment make no sense.
"They will always be ****** people" Yeah,you are a proof.
Pac agreed to NOTHINGComment
-
[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7421788]of course you cant respect them, you have been getting sonned the entire thread....Comment
-
[QUOTE=Easy Work Sr.;7421736]I give him credit for taking risks. Floyd wouldn't fight any of those guys mentioned if they were still around in their primes and in his division.
Credit goes to a man for trying and failing, as opposed to a man who never tries because he is scared to fail.Comment
-
-
the question is why is every ******* bashing Mayweather for asking for more testing when its his life on the line any boxer has the right to ask for more testing when its there life on the line in this case if Pac doesnt want to take the test then thats on himComment
-
[QUOTE=Easy Work Sr.;7421799]Seriously is that really to confusing for you grasp the general points of my comment? lol yikes
yes I read it and it was very contradictory
on one hand you say... "I think overall Mosley deserves it but I'm basing that on hard work and the road he took to get there."
then you say...
"I framed my point around whether or not as some posters had suggested, that Mayweather should have gotten the nod."

so which one is it?Comment
-
Reading this thread I came to a conclusion. No matter how much logic you employ, against a die hard pacman fan you he will never see the FACTS.
For example you have SouthPaw who say "he cherry picks his opponents since 2005". At the same time and on the same thread there have been post with Facts: That Floyd's camp issued a challenge to both Cotto and Mosley yrs ago. Your biased, so you will fail to realize after he left Bob Arum he had to make himself a major attraction. You say why did he retire, instead of fighting Cotto? Why did Cotto's camp turn down the fight twice?
Once Mayweather was able to build himself as a major attraction, everyone wants to come out of hiding and fight him for the big payday. So when you say it is not all about money, but about respect. You arguement fails.
You discredit all Mayweather opponents, so you must also feel the same way about Pacquiao opponents. If not than your whole arguement is flawed.
If Mayweather beats Shane your excuse will be is because Shane was old.
If Mayweather beats Pacquiao your excuse will be because his is the bigger fighter he was suppose to win.
If Mayweather beats Cotto, Clottey, and etc... your excuse will be they really never had a chance.
Do you realize the same time you try to discredit floyd, you praise him? Thats why I laugh at Floyd haters, because they always talk about he cherry picks opponents, he doesn't face a legit contenders, or he completely outclasses his opponents. <----- The reason why he completely outclasses his opponents is because he is on a whole other lvl.Comment
-
Comment

Comment