Comments Thread For: Mayweather Has Yet To Sign, Schaefer Getting Frustrated

[iHateThePacMan]

I think floyd loves to mess with people's head. He has to fight Shane or PWill or he will look like an ass.

[JYE71]

I told u Gayweather is just all bark and no bite. He's not going to sign aaginst Mosley because he's waiting for Calderon to step up. Wanna bet?

[iBEATBITCHES]

Mayweather has no other options and will sign the contract.

It's Mayweather vs. Mosley or nothing else.

HBO does not want anything else.
GBP, I'm pretty sure, does not want anything else.
With his antagonist fighting a tough fight in March, Floyd can't afford to lose the Mosley fight.

BOTTOM LINE IS:
He will sign. If he doesn't sign, I would be disappointed, but I wouldn't be significantly surprised.

AND FOR THE UNEDUCATED: (who I've seen leaving sht in the forum)
No excuses.
Don't say that Floyd is financially unstable and use it as a reason for signing or not signing the fight. Don't say that he can fight anyone else and still make money when Mosley can't without him.

Mayweather needs Mosley just as bad as Mosley needs Mayweather

It should get signed.

[switchsouthpaw]

only people with low-self esteem and a faded sense of self-worth look to others to make them feel better about themselves.

That would be phrased "a limited sense of self worth", faded is used incorrectly as a descriptive--improper syntax but thanks for proving my point.

[Roger Mellie]

**** i will give u the 15K right now and u can hold on to it for safe keeping.....but when Floyd signs u give me my 15K + another 15K of yours.....

You're not too bright are you. I dont doubt that Floydius will sign,but he will **** around an awful lot before he does though.

[mandirigma]

I told u Gayweather is just all bark and no bite. He's not going to sign aaginst Mosley because he's waiting for Calderon to step up. Wanna bet?

OLE SHYT, Calderon who is now as old as Shane and going up to weight where Floyd comfy hahahahahaha

[JSS]

actually i think that would be his only other option aside from fighting mosley.

1. if it's not mosley or something of that caliber (martinez? williams? bradley?) and he decides to fight someone like campbell or malignaggi no one will accept the fight.

2. if he just waits for pac-clottey to be over and then fights pac next , all will be forgiven imo. who would want to risk losing out on $40-50 mil. for fighting a superfight? make no mistake shane (old and past prime or whatever) is still a risky fight. hell clottey is a risky fight. if clottey pulls off an upset pac/arum would look so ******.

At least Pac is facing a true WW in Clottey...no drama, just two fighters wanting to entertain boxing fans. Can't say that about the Mayweather Mafia...their just full of drama and self-bravado.

[FLY TY]

That would be phrased "a limited sense of self worth", faded is used incorrectly as a descriptive--improper syntax but thanks for proving my point.

faded also means "reduced in strength."

surely LIMITED is most commonly used to describe someone's self worth, but the great thing about language is that many adjectives (faded) can be used to describe many nouns (self-worth).

having a "reduced" self-worth, is basically the same as having a "limited" one.

thanks for proving mine.

[SceneSpectator!]

are u being sarcastic? cuz its hard to tell over the net. shane was prepared to do anything to get a fight with pac, no way arum and roach lets their boy in there with mosley. pac only fights flat footed guys with no speed and limited boxing skills.
floyd will sign, this is just to draw more attention to the fight. remember hes not only fighting shane, his fight with shane is fighting pacs fight with whatever tailor made oponent mannys taking on next aswell.

Pac only beatin, flatfooted fighters??! Let's see and I bet that when the time comes that Pac beats Shane and May you would say too that they are just flatfooted guys with no speed and limited boxing skills! Because you are certified Pac hater!! You're owned!!!

[switchsouthpaw]

faded also means "reduced in strength."

surely LIMITED is most commonly used to describe someone's self worth, but the great thing about language is that many adjectives (faded) can be used to describe many nouns (self-worth).

having a "reduced" self-worth, is basically the same as having a "limited" one.

thanks for proving mine.

Then it would be correctly phrased as "having a reduced sense of self-worth", you utilization of the word as a descriptive was improper syntax. It's ok to levy insults, at least make sure they are grammatically correct smiley faces and all.