Why is everyone talking about Froch vs Dirrel?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dynamite Kid
    Slicker than your average
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 20701
    • 627
    • 209
    • 38,291

    #31
    Originally posted by Shadows
    Ian Napa doesn't fit that bill.
    Yeah thats precisely why he is my fav British fighter to watch.

    Comment

    • donkim
      Banned
      • Dec 2009
      • 434
      • 69
      • 34
      • 594

      #32
      Originally posted by The Weebler II
      Put him in a ring with Witter and I guarantee you he doesn't take a backward step. None of the British fighters are cowards, not one.

      I can't force Hatton to step up and fight Witter.He's been avoiding him for almost a decade now so don't expect him to get in the ring and fight him any time soon.





      Originally posted by Shadows
      Ian Napa doesn't fit that bill.


      Another skilled boxer who was recently ripped off against a crude bum who was given credit for having his arse handed to him.

      Comment

      • Weebler I
        El Weeblerito I
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 31113
        • 1,468
        • 1,648
        • 54,550

        #33
        Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
        Dirrell was landing punches whilst Froch was not and only a ****** would reward the guy missing with punches because of his direction of motion over the guy smacking him in the face cleanly albeit sporadically moving back to give himself the space to make Froch fall short in order to counter, its called Boxing clue up son.
        Please, neither were landing punches because one fighter kept running. It was pathetic, an excuse for a fight and not something I want associated with the sport.

        Fan are drawn to both styles, its the diversity that creates the interest. You can watch British Boxing every Friday night and see a good ole fashioned fight with hardly any skill but it dont get me excited to see some skilless **** slugging away like a neanderthal.
        Nobody wants to watch a runner.

        Correct? yeah and they do Britain proud when their staring up at the ring lights because they were too ****** to realize that not every opponent is going to play ball the way they want them to, oh guess thats the opponent running away from them? but how do they end up flat on their back and embarrassed i wonder
        I don't care if they knocked out, it's boxing, it happens. All that matters to me is that they come to fight. I would rather watch 1 Hatton defeat than 15 Malinaggi wins.

        Comment

        • Shadows
          All-Time Great
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 8293
          • 192
          • 250
          • 15,434

          #34
          Originally posted by donkim
          Another skilled boxer who was recently ripped off against a crude bum who was given credit for having his arse handed to him.





          Jamie McDonnell
          Yeah, that was the first fight I saw with him fighting and really enjoyed what I saw. If he wasn't at such a suize disadvantage, he'd be a world class fighter, IMO. I look forward to him fighting again, and downloading more of his fights.

          Dave Parris scorecard was comparable to Jarmons' for Shumenov-Campillo II. Disgusting.

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31113
            • 1,468
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #35
            Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
            Yeah thats precisely why he is my fav British fighter to watch.
            He's a Zimbabwean, he didn't come to Britain until his teens. I'd assume his parents are Zimbo too.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP