Why is everyone talking about Froch vs Dirrel?

**WhoreUs** · 02-01-2010, 07:47 PM

it's a UK vs US thing
a few weeks ago, sports debate reignited the e rivalry
somehow this fight has come back up now

**Earl-Hickey** · 02-01-2010, 07:49 PM

Originally posted by WhoreUs

it's a UK vs US thing
a few weeks ago, sports debate reignited the e rivalry
somehow this fight has come back up now

In the lounge i keep seeing NFL vs Rugby threads.

welcome to boxingscene.

**COVID-19** · 02-01-2010, 07:49 PM

Because Dirrell nuthuggers can't stand the fact that Froch won.

**Earl-Hickey** · 02-01-2010, 07:57 PM

Originally posted by �reakbeat

Because Dirrell nuthuggers can't stand the fact that Froch won.

I don't know why.

Direll shouldn't even be boxing, he should concentrate on his musical career, he could make way more money there.

here's one of Dirells songs.

**AllEyesOpen** · 02-01-2010, 08:01 PM

Originally posted by Earl-Hickey

I have been trying so hard to forget that diabolical ****-fest of a "fight"

I couldn't agree more, green k coming your way. Now I love boxing, I love to see a fighter outbox another fighter, but I've never seen a true runner until I saw Direll run for that whole ****ing fight.

& it's not a US vs. UK thing for me. I was born in the US, that was just a horrible excuse of a championship fight.

edit; you must spread reputation around before giving to Earl-Hickey again, sorry.

**Dynamite Kid** · 02-01-2010, 08:12 PM

That fight was not even close,infact the only thing close about it was how narrowly Dirrell won the rounds he won,not to say you could make an argument that because the round was won so narrowly won that Froch could of won it to, how could he when he was not landing hardly anything?

People like to make out it was close because they want to believe that Froch won. Dirrell did not dominate the rounds he won big but the bottom line is not matter how narrowly a round is won there is generally always a winner and a loser to the round,Dirrell accumulated more rounds to win a CLEAR decision.

Even the rounds i gave to Froch were sympathy rounds because he was losing so clearly. The point deduction that should not of stood made it slightly closer than it should of been,but no way was it even a close fight in my book.

You would have to be blind to score that fight for Froch, Dirrell clearly put his hands on Froch more times than Froch did to Dirrell and thats all that matters. I mean lets say you think Froch actually did better than he actually did, he still did no better than a draw.

**Mighty_Windir** · 02-01-2010, 08:27 PM

Dirrell schooled Froch so hard, it was embarrasing, I'm still appalled how they dared rob Dirrell like that, then again we all saw this coming.

**COVID-19** · 02-01-2010, 08:31 PM

Originally posted by Earl-Hickey

I don't know why.

Direll shouldn't even be boxing, he should concentrate on his musical career, he could make way more money there.

here's one of Dirells songs.

This will be an anthem for all is fans............

**The_Demon** · 02-01-2010, 08:33 PM

cuz it was a dumbass robbery

Why is everyone talking about Froch vs Dirrel?