Dirrell Got Robbed VS Froch and Will Test Abraham To The Limit

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mangler jr
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 3237
    • 134
    • 14
    • 4,113

    #21
    Originally posted by tymann23
    YYOU as a fan can have your opinion. BUT judges HAVE to follow the 4 criteria. clean punching, effective aggression, defense and ring generalship.

    with a strong emphasis on CLEAN PUNCHING. ask harold ledderman

    if the judges did their job RIGHT that fight would of been a clear UD for dirrell.

    but two of the three didnt. i personally felt froch deserved no more than 4 rounds.
    I scored it for Froch on ring generalship and effective aggression.

    It was effective because it forced Dirrell to look scared and run all night.

    Dirrell embarrassed America that night.

    Comment

    • Ch@mpBox@PR
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 21432
      • 432
      • 279
      • 22,261

      #22
      Lol at this ****.

      Dirrel didnt got robbed he himself cost him the fight. He didnt engage enough, He never attepted to fight. If he had been more active he would of won easy.

      With that said, taylor as doing pretty well till he got stiffed. Dirrel is quicker on hi feet and with his hands than Taylor. Abraham is a inactve fighter, who aits and aits to land that big punch. Dirrel can outbox him, but he needs to be busier and takes some risks to land clean punches.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP