Dirrell Got Robbed VS Froch and Will Test Abraham To The Limit

[-EAGLE-]

Translation: I gave it to Froch by way of being white.

lol everyone is on the: racist black & weight thing tonight;

come on man; i'm white and i had dirrell winning 8 rounds to 4;

make love not war

[mangler jr]

You Europeans need to just transfer to MMA. You guys seem to be more about brawls then boxing.. A guy keeps distance, and you call it running. A guy hugs when closed in on, and you call him a *****.. I call those things smart....

Was Ali a runner?
Was Holyfield a ***** hugger?

Ali engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

Holyfield engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

I had Froch winning 116-112. Dirrell was a joke that night and deserved to be dq'd for excessive holding.

[The_Demon]

atleast dirrell will have learnt something from the fight even though he was robbed
unlike froch who will be the same stumbling idiot in his next fight

my point,dirrell has a long succesful career ahead of him due to his natural talent,whereas froch's career is over after his next two fights

[Sloth]

Ali engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

Holyfield engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

I had Froch winning 116-112. Dirrell was a joke that night and deserved to be dq'd for excessive holding.

What did Froch do to win the fight.

Why was Froch warned 3-4 times for hitting behind the head, but never deducted.

Yet Dirrel was warned 2 times, and got deducted?

[Tmann400]

Ali engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

Holyfield engaged in fights. Dirrell avoids them.

I had Froch winning 116-112. Dirrell was a joke that night and deserved to be dq'd for excessive holding.

Jack, you are not that dumb.

no way in hell did you score that fight 116-112 for froch. you have more sense than that. the man landed two clean punches in the whole fight from what i saw. dirrell did not hold as much as its being said. and even if he DID. hes the only one who landed any punches on a consistent basis. end of story.

no POSSIBLE way you can give that fight to froch using the 4 criteria that are SUPPOSED to be used to score boxing matches.

Plain and simple.

[mangler jr]

What did Froch do to win the fight.

Why was Froch warned 3-4 times for hitting behind the head, but never deducted.

Yet Dirrel was warned 2 times, and got deducted?

Its obvious why. Froch had every right to hit Dirrell behind the head since it was Dirrell that was holding his other arm like a scared rabbit and wouldn't let go.

A stronger ref would've deducted more points from Dirrell and forced him to fight.

Much the way the ref in the Berto/Collazo fight deducted Berto in the 2nd round for excessive holding.

If it wasn't for that deduction by the ref, Berto/Collazo wouldn't have been the fight it was.

It would've looked like Froch/Dirrell.

[mangler jr]

Jack, you are not that dumb.

no way in hell did you score that fight 116-112 for froch. you have more sense than that. the man landed two clean punches in the whole fight from what i saw. dirrell did not hold as much as its being said. and even if he DID. hes the only one who landed any punches on a consistent basis. end of story.

no POSSIBLE way you can give that fight to froch using the 4 criteria that are SUPPOSED to be used to score boxing matches.

Plain and simple.

There was nothing to pick from. Dirrell letting his hands go 5 times in 12 rounds didn't impress me.

I scored most rounds for Froch because he tried to make the fight. I have no sympathy for a guy who shows up merely to spoil and thats what Dirrell did.

Froch won it for me on sheer aggressiveness and initiative.

[Tmann400]

There was nothing to pick from. Dirrell letting his hands go 5 times in 12 rounds didn't impress me.

I scored most rounds for Froch because he tried to make the fight. I have no sympathy for a guy who shows up merely to spoil and thats what Dirrell did.

Froch won it for me on sheer aggressiveness and initiative.

YYOU as a fan can have your opinion. BUT judges HAVE to follow the 4 criteria. clean punching, effective aggression, defense and ring generalship.

with a strong emphasis on CLEAN PUNCHING. ask harold ledderman

if the judges did their job RIGHT that fight would of been a clear UD for dirrell.

but two of the three didnt. i personally felt froch deserved no more than 4 rounds.

[βetamax]

There was nothing to pick from. Dirrell letting his hands go 5 times in 12 rounds didn't impress me.

I scored most rounds for Froch because he tried to make the fight. I have no sympathy for a guy who shows up merely to spoil and thats what Dirrell did.

Froch won it for me on sheer aggressiveness and initiative.

Chuck Giampa, is that you?

[CrackYourJaw]

Kinda like Jackie Chan, running away from the bad guys but kicking their ass and landing the more effective punches in the process.

"Leave me alone!"