Khan and Hatton Make Calzaghe look like a complete JOKE.

[-Reflexes-]

Calzaghe.
You and other people act as if Calzaghe was in his prime when he beat Jones and Hopkins. Why didn't they go to England if they really wanted a piece of him?? Why does it always have to be "come to the U.S.A"???

Who on Calzaghes resume compares to Mayweather and Pac in their primes?

You cant be serious.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Who on Calzaghes resume compares to Mayweather and Pac in their primes?

You cant be serious.

He fought Mayweather outside his weight though. I still give him some props for it but the way I see Hatton at WW is the same way I see DLH at MW.

Outside of those 2 and an Old Zoo. What else?? The overrated and loud mouth Malignaggi?? lol

I like Hatton, but he doesn't come close to Calzaghe.

[jrosales13]

I think this is the first time I have ever seen Chicano and Ch@mp agree... And, I must say I agree with both of them... In the all time list I rank Cal higher than Hatton... I am a fan of Khan but wit him is based on potential. Which doesn't count...

[-Reflexes-]

He fought Mayweather outside his weight though. I still give him some props for it but the way I see Hatton at WW is the same way I see DLH at MW.

Outside of those 2 and an Old Zoo. What else?? The overrated and loud mouth Malignaggi?? lol

I like Hatton, but he doesn't come close to Calzaghe.

I think ur confused on the point Im trying to make. Hatton fighting Floyd at WW PROVES my point that he FOUGHT tougher fighters.

He fought:

Mayweather the P4P Number 1

Pacman the P4P Number 1

No one Calzaghes resume comes close to that.

[Mr. Fantastic]

I think this is the first time I have ever seen Chicano and Ch@mp agree... And, I must say I agree with both of them... In the all time list I rank Cal higher than Hatton... I am a fan of Khan but wit him is based on potential. Which doesn't count...

Burner was probably one of them fools that was part of the Lacy hype.

[southcentralcar]

calzaghe is overrated .. i dont think he's worse than khan or hatton cuz those two havent done too much either but beating two boxers who are no longer in their prime and call yourself a legend killer.. btw old hopkins almost got calzaghe

[-Reflexes-]

Burner was probably one of them fools that was part of the Lacy hype.

Man what are you talking about?

Im asking who FOUGHT the tougher comp Hatton OR Calzaghe.

[MOTHER DUCKER]

I said this before if Calzaghe is a joke bhop is no better! all he has is a few more well known names over Joe in Tito/Oscar who were out of there depth anyway..

So is Khan and Hatton making Bhop a joke?

Joe was around 36 when he face Bhop/Jones, isn't Jones around 38 or something and two of Bhops best wins sandwich his loss to Joe (the wins were Tarver and Pavlik)

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Burner was probably one of them fools that was part of the Lacy hype.

Lol I coign that as well

[-Reflexes-]

I said this before if Calzaghe is a joke bhop is no better! all he has is a few more well known names over Joe in Tito/Oscar who were out of there depth anyway..

So is Khan and Hatton making Bhop a joke?

Joe was around 36 when he face Bhop/Jones, isn't Jones around 38 or something and two of Bhops best wins sandwich his loss to Joe (the wins were Tarver and Pavlik)

Im no big Hopkins guy either.

Im asking a simple question:

Hatton or Calzaghe who fought the better fighters.