The words "risk" and "Mayweather" should be illegal to use in the same sentence. Pretty Girl Fraud shows the same amount of courage in selecting his opponents as he does in the ring: None
I'm not Klitschko2009 I just discovered this site the other day, I have had nom previous accounts here.
Dude you know nothing, those guys all lost because they were limited fighters......they weren't past prime, they just got owned by superior fighters. 31 is in your physical prime, simple ,jerk.
Your wrong , he's right, 31 might be a lot of peoples physical prime, though i would say closer to 28, physically that is, but for boxing it is completely different. if you have 5 plus wars against too opponents by the time your 25 , you most likely wont be in your prime at 31, its different for every person. albeit morales is coming out of retirement but when you look at his career people will say his prime was 25-28, and that can be the same case for a lot of fighter. for some it can be 32-35. and yeah for some it can be 31, but not for every person. you're coming off as very narrow minded.
Your wrong , he's right, 31 might be a lot of peoples physical prime, though i would say closer to 28, physically that is, but for boxing it is completely different. if you have 5 plus wars against too opponents by the time your 25 , you most likely wont be in your prime at 31, its different for every person. albeit morales is coming out of retirement but when you look at his career people will say his prime was 25-28, and that can be the same case for a lot of fighter. for some it can be 32-35. and yeah for some it can be 31, but not for every person. you're coming off as very narrow minded.
STFU moron. 31 is your prime SIMPLE quit making excuses for your pathetic heroes.
More like laugh at the demented *****s who voted for Fraud Gayweather
Poet
so i take it you voted for joe calzaghe tooks more risks....
in that case.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .............................
Quick answer... Calzaghe, cause no one is a risk to floyd, he's that good... LOL j/k - Honestly early career-wise it goes to Floyd, later career (although floyd's isn't over yet so this could change) i give to calzaghe.
I think floyd will change that though...
Why?
Going up in weight to fight the lineal and ring champion 34 year old Oscar in your debut at the weight, how does Calzaghe tops that? How about undefeated 43-0 prime and younger champion Ricky Hatton? How about the p4p #2 in the world in Marquez. I know it was not the best weight for Marquez but still...
Risk is relative. OF course if you are a bum you would have accomplished a big deal when you beat the likes of Lacy or Kessler but no one considers Calzaghe a bum, so he should be compared using the SAME standards. I do know both Lacy and Kessler where undefeated and despite Kessler being a good continental level fighter, look at what happened when he traveled overseas. I won't even comment on Lacy he was a plain out bum from the day 1.
so i take it you voted for joe calzaghe tooks more risks....
in that case.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .............................
Well I sure as hell wasn't going to vote for Pretty Gay Floyd who's never taken a risk in his life. Talk about being born with a silver crack pipe in his mouth
Comment