Is Pacmans resume as great in reality as it does on paper ?
Collapse
-
-
Pacman is great for the for a couple of reasons. He takes on any challenge , he puts out his opponents in great fashion, and just charismatic and his whole persona , he is a humble guy who is enjoying success after coming from nothing , dont hate on the guy. Now his resume might have some "weak" names on it. De la Hoya and Hatton are looked by some as fights that catapulted him. And IMO Nobody gets credit for beating De la Hoya at this point of time , at least in my book. Too inconsistent in his fights in the past few years , not in the best shape , kind of washed up and just weight drained. Now Hatton , Hatton is a good fighter who earned his big bucks brawling , and had the perfect style to get koed the way he did. Just look at hisfight against Mayweather, he wasnt looking for a ko , and he just adaopted so well , to that fight , that Floyd threw that left hook perfectly after going at it for as long as they did. Hatton gave mayweather the blueprint to ko him , and Floyd just used it to perfection , other than that. Manny still has a lot to offer , and IMO , HOF , one of the greates of all time , and If for some hes not there yet , with his next few fights he will achieve that level and gain that respect. He is a hero of the sport of this era. PERIODComment
-
like a bunch of white guys are going to objectively analyze both fighters careers where was pac in 2000-2005..how come pac never won fighter of the year before 2006..lol"peeleft:The Ring Magazine in their March 2010 issue, proclaimed Pacman as The Fighter of the DecadeComment

Comment