Vitali Klitschko to fight .... or else!

**SacTown1** · 05-06-2005, 01:23 PM

Originally posted by Torino

The WBC rule........

Klitschko must face the Winner of the WBC Interim Heavyweight Title fight between Hasim Rahman and Monte Barrett on July 23, 2005 in New York or his WBC Title will be vacant and the Winner of the Interim Title Fight will become the true WBC Champion.

The date for Vitali's defense of his WBC title has been set for 09/24/05.

he'll ***** out..again, like always

**ejk22** · 05-06-2005, 01:28 PM

Originally posted by Torino

The WBC rule........

Klitschko must face the Winner of the WBC Interim Heavyweight Title fight between Hasim Rahman and Monte Barrett on July 23, 2005 in New York or his WBC Title will be vacant and the Winner of the Interim Title Fight will become the true WBC Champion.

The date for Vitali's defense of his WBC title has been set for 09/24/05.

Well I don't blame the WBC for that ruling. You need to have a clear champion not someone who milks it. Granted Vitali needs to be healthy enough to fight. If he is healthy then he needs to fight.

**czars_salad** · 05-06-2005, 01:59 PM

these heavyweight bitches don't live up to the name of their division for their reluctance to face one another. this division should renamed "softweight"

**AintGottaClue** · 05-06-2005, 02:16 PM

Originally posted by SacTown1

he'll ***** out..again, like always

liek always? i cant beilve peopel r callign him ***** and claim he milks the title, need i remind u guys he was gonna fight rahman in june, got hurt and had it set back, then canceled cause the problem was more then they thought.

**TheGreat1** · 05-06-2005, 02:22 PM

You guys are pretty harsh, VK is a pretty tough guy, people get hurt in training, it's part of the sport, Why whould you want to get into the ring with a guy like Rahman or even Barrett if you are not at 100%?

**ejk22** · 05-06-2005, 02:24 PM

I am a fan of Vitali's, but I am also fair in my assessments of fighters. I believe Vitali has done a phenomenal job of milking the title for a full year. Yes he is injured and I give him the benefit of the doubt but at the same time when he gets healthy again he needs to be more active in defending his championship.

**riz** · 05-06-2005, 02:38 PM

dec 6 - beat Johhson
april 24th - beat sanders
dec 11 - beat williams

3 fights in one year n 5 days, thts pretty good. he's injured which is why hes not fighting. when he recovers he will defend, n win

**Torino** · 05-06-2005, 03:04 PM

Not sure where Scrotumville... ..er.. .....Nutcity.....er...Testiclevally......I mean Sactown and the other are coming from.

It was Rahman who originaly delayed the fight. Byrd refused to fight Wladimir. Lennox Lewis gave up belts rather than fight. It happens all the time. To call Vitali a ***** for delaying a fight due to injury is just bias and hateful.

Also I believe Vitali has been very active. Compare his activity to Byrd, Ruiz, Brewster, or even Lewis. Lewis only fought once a year. Vitali has been just as active or more active than all of them. So I don't know what are your talking about?

**ejk22** · 05-06-2005, 03:10 PM

He won the belt April 24 2004. Defended it once against a waste of space in Danny Williams on December 11th 2004 and that's it. He needs to be a bit more active than one fight per year.

Vitali Klitschko to fight .... or else!