Comments Thread For: Pacquiao is Already Looking Sharp in Training Camp
Collapse
-
LOLZ SO MUCH HATE!!! PAC-CLOTTEY is a LOT of thing but IT AINT A BULL**** FIGHT!!!We all know PBF ain't taking less than 50/50 no matter what he does so if Arum tries that the outcome will be no suprise. Nobody should call it a duck either. Either do straight up business or no business.
But as far as the Clottey fight is concerned why would anybody watch that ****? Even a person that is a fan of Manny why would you watch it when it is a feeding the lambs to the lion type of fight. **** Clottey hasn't started training yet, he not even in America and Clottey trainer can't get a U.S. visa and I am expected to buy this fight on PPV?? LLS hell no.
As a PBF fan if he fights anybody besides Mosley I will NOT order his PPV either!!!!
SHOWING NO SUPPORT FOR BULL**** FIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
only better WW fight than a PAC-Clottey are ...
PAC-Mayweather, PAC-Mosley or PAC-Williams
(if P.Will can still go down WW)
Mayweather-Mosley & Mayweather-WilliamsComment
-
from the irs website:
You will be considered a U.S. resident for tax purposes if you meet the substantial presence test for the calendar year. To meet this test, you must be physically present in the United States on at least:
31 days during the current year, and
183 days during the 3-year period that includes the current year and the 2 years immediately before that, counting:
All the days you were present in the current year, and
1/3 of the days you were present in the first year before the current year, and
1/6 of the days you were present in the second year before the current year.Comment
-
You read my post wrong and implied things I never put there. I know Clottey is not a bad fighter and if all things were fair I would say that this is a decent fight. But take into consideration that Clottey flew to the U.S. to get a few things straight and then start training. Clottey now flies back to Ghana because his trainer can not get a U.S. visa. The fight is March 13, the month of January is basically over. February is the shortest month of the year and then the fight is the 2nd week of March. You trying to tell me Clottey will be prepared to the best of his ability???? If you are that is bull****. Clottey hasn't even truly started training yet then and if his trainer gets a visa they will have to fly to the U.S. and adjust to the time difference. I just don't see this as being the fight it could have been if Clottey's team didn't have these problems.clottey is a good fight bro.
it's not mayweather-pacquiao but it's a good fight.
silly to talk crap about clottey.
a few months ago people were talking about clottey being robbed against cotto and how pacquiao shouldn't be fighting cotto and fight clottey instead.
1. mosley
2. pacquiao
3. mayweather
4. cotto
5. clottey
#1 was fighting berto at the time.
he couldn't get a deal with #3.
he just beat #4.
#5 clottey is the next best choice.
should be a winnable fight for pacquiao but it wouldn't surprise me if clottey pulls off an upset.
you're drinking too much pac syrup if you don't think clottey has a shot.Comment
-
Yall are not reading why I feel its a bull**** fight. It being a bull**** fight has nothing to do with the fighter abilities. Yall read bull**** then shut down instead reading the whole post with a open mind to comprehend what I saying.
Again re-read what I wrote as to the reasons of why Clottey won't be fully prepared as to why I feel it will be a bull**** fight. I know Clottey is a good fighter and if all things were straight I would feel this was a good fight but Clottey has to much outside **** going right now with the fight not that far away to be about to face his biggest challenge.
I see it the way I see and you see it the way you do. How was anything I stated hate?Comment
-
-
pacquiao claims he talked to god, but he talked the the devil and not god. it was then how he gained his powers.
notice his trunks
Comment
-
It doesn't get reset. It's a front-weighted 3-year sliding window:
Substantial Presence Test: You will also be considered a U.S. resident for tax purposes if you meet the substantial presence test for the calendar year. To meet this test, you must be physically present in the United States on at least:- 31 days during the current year, and
- 183 days during the 3-year period that includes the current year and the 2 years immediately before that, counting:
- All the days you were present in the current year, and
- 1/3 of the days you were present in the first year before the current year, and
- 1/6 of the days you were present in the second year before the current year.
Example:
You were physically present in the United States on 120 days in each of the years 2006, 2007, and 2008. To determine if you meet the substantial presence test for 2008, count the full 120 days of presence in 2008, 40 days in 2007 (1/3 of 120), and 20 days in 2006 (1/6 of 120). Since the total for the 3-year period is 180 days, you are not considered a resident under the substantial presence test for 2008.
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/articl...203094,00.html
Comment
-
Comment
m/
Comment