Originally posted by marvdave
Who is the weakest Heavyweight champ in history?
Collapse
-
Is it?Originally posted by marvdaveMicheal Spinks was one of the best light heavy champs ever. He won two controversial decisions against old man Holmes.( no way he won the second Holmes fight, #1 was close) He beat Steffan Tangstad and Drunk Cooney. Not exactly great. He was a good heavyweight at best. I find it curious how you would question anyone saying Spinks, but then saying Lewis is one of the worst? That's nuts!
Comment
-
can't argue with that logic.Originally posted by ImiraIt's not nuts to me. Lewis was boring and unimposing at times.
Lennox Lewis was an above average Heavyweight who would be a tough match up for any Heavyweight. We will have to agree to disagree, becuase I think Lewis was both exciting and imposing in the ring.Comment
-
-
marciano fought in the weakest era ever ..he was the only prime good fighter...not his fault tho..but he should of lost to moore he was saved by the refComment
-
Originally posted by Living LegendI say chris byrd...when I think of a heavy weight champ, I think of ali, liston, marciano, tyson, holmes, foreman etc...I'm used to heavywieght champs being the biggest and the baddest...You know when they step in the ring someone is going to get beat the f**k up...!!!
Does Lamon Brewster count? If so, he's the worst hw champ ever.Comment
Comment