Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Floyd win over Moseley is better than ANY win on Pacs resume.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Suckers..... Hook, line, and sinker!!!!!

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by piye View Post
      Fact.

      Moseley is an ATG and better than any of the fighters on Pac's resume, including Cotto.

      I will agree once it happen.Right now Floyd is waiting for something to happen..........



      GROW BALLS Hello FRUITY BOY FLOYD

      Comment


      • #73
        They are gonna say that mosley is shot and past his prime 1yr not fighting made him rusty and etc. Either if it was Floyd or Pacquiao hater will discredit the fighters.

        Comment


        • #74
          After so many years finally or should I say, for now hopefully, Floyd's fighting a welterweight. It seems that most fans here are underestimating Shane.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by odogg8121 View Post
            Who did Pac fight that was in thier prime? u can argue Marquez but he beat pac on the real lol
            everyone exept hoya......

            Comment


            • #76
              Since when has Mosleys legacy been better then Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales,arguably two top 5 greatest mexican boxers ever

              Comment


              • #77
                I have noticed that many people on this forum are unable to have a rational conversation without resorting to nonsense.

                Who can honestly tell me that this shane at 38 would not beat both morales and Barrera at any stage in there career? no one can. of course it's a harder fight than anything on either guys resume. I mean I'm not giving Floyd credit for it! how can I? the fight has yet to be signed! but if it is the facts are there! the only fighter that stands a chance against shane in reality not one of this P4P non sense is cotto! who is not the same fighter! I wouldn't say he is shot but he has clearly deteriorated.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by piye View Post
                  I have noticed that many people on this forum are unable to have a rational conversation without resorting to nonsense.

                  Who can honestly tell me that this shane at 38 would not beat both morales and Barrera at any stage in there career? no one can. of course it's a harder fight than anything on either guys resume. I mean I'm not giving Floyd credit for it! how can I? the fight has yet to be signed! but if it is the facts are there! the only fighter that stands a chance against shane in reality not one of this P4P non sense is cotto! who is not the same fighter! I wouldn't say he is shot but he has clearly deteriorated.
                  you consider yourself a rational poster and youre talking about a barrera and morales fighting sugar shane?......wow..........

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Why is that sop far fetched? Pac could fight him! Barrera just fought Khan at 140 My point is even if it's because he is a bigger man a fight against Shane is harder!

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by PrettyBoy22 View Post
                      Morales beat Pacquiao though. Marquez beat Pacquiao (he did, face it). Just because Pacquiao has fought better fighters, does not make him a greater fighter. Floyd has never been beat and he fought PRIME Hatton PRIME Gatti PRIME Corrales PRIME Castillo. These guys are not bums
                      Care to read that again. Are you not contradicting yourself?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP