A Floyd win over Moseley is better than ANY win on Pacs resume.

[piye]

I agree with the fact that pac desserves credit for taking the fight as he was definitely an underdog but think he does not desserve credit for beating a weight drained DLH i mean revisionist history is used all the time! loads of people said Floyd had to fight Baldomir! he was the linear champ had just beaten Zab had a win iver Gatti and Clottey. After Floyd beats him Baldomir was a bum! I mean come on! the Baldomir that Floyd beat would have beaten the DLH that Pac fought! neither fighter deserves credit for wither win in hind sight as they were clearly superior to the opponent but people tend to overlook these instances with Pac and highlight them with Floyd.

[PrettyBoy22]

Morales beat Pacquiao though. Marquez beat Pacquiao (he did, face it). Just because Pacquiao has fought better fighters, does not make him a greater fighter. Floyd has never been beat and he fought PRIME Hatton PRIME Gatti PRIME Corrales PRIME Castillo. These guys are not bums

[baracuda]

not really......its not even better than pac's win vs cotto ....

[piye]

not really......its not even better than pac's win vs cotto ....

Cotto is Pacs best win. And Shane is a better fighter than Cotto.

[-EX-]

No its not...Shane isn't in his prime...

[piye]

No its not...Shane isn't in his prime...

I agree with that but neither was Cotto, Barrera or Morales, who could honestly tell me forget Pound for Pound and all of that nonsense that Shane would not beat the version pac fought of all of those guys? Shane beats everyone one of them! many because he is the bigger man fare enough but if you forget fictional pound for pound for a moment the facts are it's just a harder fight! Fact.

[baracuda]

Cotto is Pacs best win. And Shane is a better fighter than Cotto.

no it aint, ...... cotto beat shane ...

[baracuda]

I agree with that but neither was Cotto, Barrera or Morales, who could honestly tell me forget Pound for Pound and all of that nonsense that Shane would not beat the version pac fought of all of those guys? Shane beats everyone one of them! many because he is the bigger man fare enough but if you forget fictional pound for pound for a moment the facts are it's just a harder fight! Fact.

cotto 28,barrera 29, morales 29 jmm 1 29.......shane 38...............lol

[tesla_power]

Morales beat Pacquiao though. Marquez beat Pacquiao (he did, face it). Just because Pacquiao has fought better fighters, does not make him a greater fighter. Floyd has never been beat and he fought PRIME Hatton PRIME Gatti PRIME Corrales PRIME Castillo. These guys are not bums

If you like opinions, I'd say Floyd lost to Castillo. You could make arguments for Corrales, Castillo, possibly Hatton( IMO, prime Hatton was in the Tszyu fight) but not Gatti. Come one. You do know how may wars Gatti has been through. It's amazing he lasted that long. RIP Gatti. For Pac, prime MAB and prime JMM.

[piye]

Why are you trying to turn it into a joke? have a conversation like an adult. Cotto was younger but we all know that fighters peak etc differently! and we all know Cotto was not the same after the Margarito fight. But in all honesty bar Cotto who would lose to shane in a rematch who on Pac mans resume beats Shane? no one.