try put chris john in a court of law and see how well he defends himself in english. sometimes i think people wish he was on something. pac is innocent, and agreed to more tests thats ever been done.
i hope you are right but he has done himself no favours with this interview, his management team should have thought about this... roach should have been there to back him up!
and i cant help thinking that this was a smart move by mayweather, if it was, he has got the exact result he wanted, some people on this site and a lot of other boxing fans will beleive that manny is on riods!! and untll he proves otherwise it will tarnnish his legacy
I wont be surprised. The education system & society in general is slowly but surely descending into amorality & barbarism. Even though we live in the technology age where knowledge is a click away, people (young people especially) are more lacking of knowledge than ever before.
When did Pacquiao refuse testing? As far as im concerned he has passed all required test & no one has yet to produce a single iota of steroid use. Pacquiao has passed, obliged, & respected all required tests, rules, regulation, and his sports commissions sovereignty.
So not only does Pacquiao obliged mayweather's extra testing its not good enough.
Because Pac said yes to 24 days but mayweather wont budge from 14 he's a steroid user.
Its the epitome of sporting McCarthyism.
As I said,
Mccarthy branded people commies and gave them no chance to prove otherwise.
Are you asking me or him? Apparently Roach needs a translator as well.
Don't know why that's relevant.
He articulated quite fine to me.
And how many times has he said this before?
What do you think it means?
That he never really changed his mind on the matter...he turned down 14 days when he heard it and anything just before the fight...he repated this as you said in the interview.
So, he's ok with blood testing as long as it's not the day before. But not during training either. How about after karoake?
Again, don't know how karoake and staying up some nights is some how hindering his training to an extreme degree. Kind of a non-sequitor there.
The difference is, people were given little chance to clear their name once they were branded by Joe.
Pac has that chance... but just didn't take it
People were given a chance to clear their name by submitting to McCarthy's subpoena. There were people, who were non-Communists, who felt Joe was full of **** and acting Un-American and refused to comply with McCarthy's witch hunt. They were unfairly branded as Communists and blacklisted.
The point is, why should Pacquiao have to clear his name in the first place? He's never tested positive and has never show any signs of being on PEDs other than being good.
Is Pacquiao acting su****ious? Sure. Does being su****ious mean he's guilty? No.
Comment