Manny Paquaio on why he didn't want to take the blood test [interview]

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lady Fan
    The Voice of Reason
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 778
    • 126
    • 13
    • 10,293

    #191
    The Pacman's interview went well. He explained everything clearly. JAT

    Comment

    • turkish981
      Up and Comer
      • May 2006
      • 35
      • 2
      • 0
      • 6,362

      #192
      Originally posted by fcastro1
      try put chris john in a court of law and see how well he defends himself in english. sometimes i think people wish he was on something. pac is innocent, and agreed to more tests thats ever been done.
      i hope you are right but he has done himself no favours with this interview, his management team should have thought about this... roach should have been there to back him up!

      and i cant help thinking that this was a smart move by mayweather, if it was, he has got the exact result he wanted, some people on this site and a lot of other boxing fans will beleive that manny is on riods!! and untll he proves otherwise it will tarnnish his legacy

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #193
        Originally posted by Foodie Too
        The Pacman's interview went well. He explained everything clearly. JAT

        Something we both agree on

        Comment

        • southcentralcar
          Undisputed Champion
          • Mar 2009
          • 2452
          • 152
          • 134
          • 8,735

          #194
          Originally posted by Palokaj
          at least i'm not crying like a little b*tch; i say it again; get a life.
          i aint crying im laughin

          Comment

          • DonTaseMeBrah
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 5828
            • 683
            • 575
            • 6,409

            #195
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            This convo is over.
            He said yes to 3 blood tests, january 30, 30 days before the fight, then immediately after the fight.

            Pacquiao then said 24 days & after the fight but mayweather refused to budge from 14 days.

            Comment

            • Syf
              KO Artist
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 7574
              • 291
              • 191
              • 14,978

              #196
              Originally posted by DonTaseMeBrah
              I wont be surprised. The education system & society in general is slowly but surely descending into amorality & barbarism. Even though we live in the technology age where knowledge is a click away, people (young people especially) are more lacking of knowledge than ever before.



              When did Pacquiao refuse testing? As far as im concerned he has passed all required test & no one has yet to produce a single iota of steroid use. Pacquiao has passed, obliged, & respected all required tests, rules, regulation, and his sports commissions sovereignty.

              So not only does Pacquiao obliged mayweather's extra testing its not good enough.

              Because Pac said yes to 24 days but mayweather wont budge from 14 he's a steroid user.

              Its the epitome of sporting McCarthyism.


              As I said,

              Mccarthy branded people commies and gave them no chance to prove otherwise.

              Pac has that chance.


              Now go back to Am History 101 youngster lol

              Comment

              • p4p-champ
                King of the Ring
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 4298
                • 221
                • 33
                • 10,890

                #197
                Originally posted by Foodie Too
                The Pacman's interview went well. He explained everything clearly. JAT
                at least she made me laugh.

                Comment

                • rao007
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 3179
                  • 139
                  • 31
                  • 9,579

                  #198
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Are you asking me or him? Apparently Roach needs a translator as well.
                  Don't know why that's relevant.


                  He articulated quite fine to me.
                  And how many times has he said this before?


                  What do you think it means?
                  That he never really changed his mind on the matter...he turned down 14 days when he heard it and anything just before the fight...he repated this as you said in the interview.


                  So, he's ok with blood testing as long as it's not the day before. But not during training either. How about after karoake?
                  Again, don't know how karoake and staying up some nights is some how hindering his training to an extreme degree. Kind of a non-sequitor there.

                  Comment

                  • southcentralcar
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 2452
                    • 152
                    • 134
                    • 8,735

                    #199
                    Originally posted by Palokaj
                    i don't care man; even if they take cocain or heroin or smoke weed the whole day; as long as they give me a good fight i don't care!

                    Mike Tyson was catched with weed! So what? Give that guy a break his wife left him! hahaha you guys on this forum are to damn serious; haf fun man;
                    u know the difference between ******* heroin and roids, right ? haha

                    Comment

                    • RockStar45
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 333
                      • 13
                      • 0
                      • 6,414

                      #200
                      Originally posted by Syf
                      The difference is, people were given little chance to clear their name once they were branded by Joe.

                      Pac has that chance... but just didn't take it
                      People were given a chance to clear their name by submitting to McCarthy's subpoena. There were people, who were non-Communists, who felt Joe was full of **** and acting Un-American and refused to comply with McCarthy's witch hunt. They were unfairly branded as Communists and blacklisted.

                      The point is, why should Pacquiao have to clear his name in the first place? He's never tested positive and has never show any signs of being on PEDs other than being good.

                      Is Pacquiao acting su****ious? Sure. Does being su****ious mean he's guilty? No.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP