Why demand PED testing for the biggest fight in history?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
So that's now four excuses for why he lost to Morales, but this one is the one you believe most because?
Did Pacquiao look weak in the first Morales fight to you? Not to me especially in the 12th round. Pacquiao was also cut in the second Marquez fight, did he not win that fight, did he not win a lot of the final rounds as well round 10 comes to mind.
Arthur Abraham and his opponents
Whats the point of a blood test before training and after a fight? Both of those dates are worthless. One Random test with a 30 day cut of point? Whats the point of that?Comment
-
One random test with a cutoff point and two on fixed dates. Does that sound like random testing 3-5 times during his training camp to you?
Never said Schaefer was a saint, but so far its Arum that's done all the lying about this fight.Comment
-
Going back to the question of the thread:
"Why demand PED testing for the biggest fight in history?"
This isn't about Mayweather wanting all those good things for boxing... he never cared for the sport. He left boxing when it was at its lowest, saying it is dead without him. He always says he doesn't get that much respect from the sport, you think he wants this tests "for the good of the sport?" Do you actually think he want this "tests" because this is a mega-fight and an historic fight and that both parties should be clean? Mayweather wants a level playing field? Come on. Fairness is not in Mayweather's vocabulary, just ask Marquez.
Either Mayweather wants added edge over Pacquiao or he doesn't want to fight him at all. While I believe stricter testing is necessary for boxing as a whole, it should not be the reason this specific fight should not to happen. Floyd has fought all of his fights without those tests before, he should have agreed to what is being offered, as it is over and above what is required already. He did say that he can beat Pacquaio under "any circumstances."
With this negotiations getting media attention, the boxing commissions are now under the microscope and might rethink their testing strategies. If the kits are commercially available and will not be that expensive, I'm sure they'd be more than happy to adopt such testing, as they are mandated to do so to protect the fighters anyway.Comment
-
So that's now four excuses for why he lost to Morales, but this one is the one you believe most because?
Did Pacquiao look weak in the first Morales fight to you? Not to me especially in the 12th round. Pacquiao was also cut in the second Marquez fight, did he not win that fight, did he not win a lot of the final rounds as well round 10 comes to mind.
I saw that link you posted, but it had no specifics. Are you saying Abraham had fights in the past that required both fighters to have multiple blood tests? If you say so, I believe you, but can you give a link just to verify for which specific fights this was done?
Or are you saying the upcoming Abraham-Dirrell fight will require such testing? Again, if you say so, I believe you, but can you give a link just to verify? I googled but found nothing on Abraham-Dirrell blood testing. Maybe my google skillz suck.
Also, it would seem to me that if Pacquiao is taking anything, it would be EPO (the stuff Mosley admitted to using) right before the fight, as Pac has freakish stamina (see first Morales fight and first Barrera fight for good examples). But from what I understand, EPO is detected by urine testsPacquiao has agreed to unlimited urine tests.
But then again I'm no PED expert...
Again, Team Pacquiao agreed to one blood draw at the presscon, one blood draw on or before the 24-day cutoff, one blood draw after the fight, and unlimited urine testing. Again, I ask you ladies and gentlemen, can you name another fight where this much testing was done?Comment
-
Mayweather is also going to be the one getting into the ring, shouldn't he have the right to request more stringent testing?
When Roach initially agreed to the tests were you against it then? Can I assume that if I search your post history I will come across posts from you condemning it then?
I saw that link you posted, but it had no specifics. Are you saying Abraham had fights in the past that required both fighters to have multiple blood tests? If you say so, I believe you, but can you give a link just to verify for which specific fights this was done?
Or are you saying the upcoming Abraham-Dirrell fight will require such testing? Again, if you say so, I believe you, but can you give a link just to verify? I googled but found nothing on Abraham-Dirrell blood testing. Maybe my google skillz suck.
Has there ever been a ww champion who had to put his belt on the line after agreeing to a catchweight before? Has there ever been a fight were the stipulation was included for a fine of 10m for every pound over the limit before? Can I assume that I will find posts from you condemning these as well?
Also, it would seem to me that if Pacquiao is taking anything, it would be EPO (the stuff Mosley admitted to using) right before the fight, as Pac has freakish stamina (see first Morales fight and first Barrera fight for good examples). But from what I understand, EPO is detected by urine testsPacquiao has agreed to unlimited urine tests.
But then again I'm no PED expert...
Again, Team Pacquiao agreed to one blood draw at the presscon, one blood draw on or before the 24-day cutoff, one blood draw after the fight, and unlimited urine testing. Again, I ask you ladies and gentlemen, can you name another fight where this much testing was done?Last edited by General Zod; 01-18-2010, 08:22 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Would manny requesting Flyod not to use pain killers in his hands for training cos of the magnitude of the fight be acceptable? I mean he has been using it for years, just like Manny has been doing the normal drug testing. Since this is the fight of the century no one should have an advantage.
It sounds silly but Im using your agruement for the other side.Comment
Comment